Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-di04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id A43E038000081; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 16:33:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TZ72u-0003oj-4v for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 21:32:24 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TZ72t-0003oa-OH for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 21:32:23 +0000 Received: from out1.ip02ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.238]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TZ72s-0008B4-3g for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 21:32:22 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ag8CAMFepVBcHvk5/2dsb2JhbAANN8NZAQGCDQEBAQEDOBFACwkLBAkWDwkDAgECAUUGAQwIAQGxU5NUjDGGLAOVfJMy X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.83,259,1352073600"; d="scan'208";a="409619979" Received: from host-92-30-249-57.as13285.net (HELO [192.168.2.3]) ([92.30.249.57]) by out1.ip02ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 15 Nov 2012 21:32:21 +0000 Message-ID: <50A55F67.2070403@psk31.plus.com> Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 21:32:23 +0000 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tobias DG3LV , rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FB56BEE@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be> <50A549B1.6070405@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <50A549B1.6070405@gmx.de> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Tobias Very nice to get a signal to you tonight. I am just concentrating on the reports, that is most odd, no negative values, fairly sure I was +16dB with you.:-) Is that v0 4 rev 2731 ? [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Scan-Signature: 3b8620872b19e25fb6f4dfaf1256edc3 Subject: Re: LF: JT9-1 test on 500khz + 1400hz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1da60850a55f9c34b4 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Tobias Very nice to get a signal to you tonight. I am just concentrating on the reports, that is most odd, no negative values, fairly sure I was +16dB with you.:-) Is that v0 4 rev 2731 ? 73 Eddie On 15/11/2012 19:59, Tobias DG3LV wrote: > Hi Eddie, Hi Rik ! > > reports : > 1951 2 13 0.4 1406. 0.0 TEST OR7T JO2 > 1952 3 5 0.6 1418. 0.0 > 1953 10 23 0.3 1406. 0.0 OR7T TEST > 1954 10 16 0.5 1418. 0.0 G3ZJO TEST > 1955 10 16 0.5 1406. 0.0 OR7T TEST > > running WSJT-X rev 2731, is this ok that there are no negative SNRs? > > 73 de dg3lv Tobias > > Am 15.11.2012 20:14, schrieb Rik Strobbe: >> Dear all, >> >> Eddie, G3ZJO, and I are going to have a JT9-1 test this evening >> between 20:00 and 21:00 UTC. >> The goal (at my side) is to compare WSJT-X v0.03 and v0.04. >> Eddie will transmit the even minutes and I will take the odd minutes. >> Frequency: 500kHz dial and 1400Hz audio (so 501.4kHz TX frequency). >> All reports are welcome. >> >> 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T >> > > > ----- > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2441/5396 - Release Date: 11/15/12 > >