Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mp04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 7F21E380000AE; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 17:28:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TYlQY-0007Im-3a for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 22:27:22 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TYlQX-0007Ic-Kj for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 22:27:21 +0000 Received: from out1.ip03ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.239]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TYlQV-00005f-Kh for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 22:27:20 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvMBAGkSpFBOlmWJ/2dsb2JhbAANN7EKk08Cgg0BAQEBAycREQU7CwcCCwQJFggHCQMCAQIBHxQBERMCBAEBAQEOCwSHWAMap1qJcwOJXowthiwDlXyJSIlqgWQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.83,252,1352073600"; d="scan'208";a="405074764" Received: from host-78-150-101-137.as13285.net (HELO [192.168.2.3]) ([78.150.101.137]) by out1.ip03ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 14 Nov 2012 22:27:17 +0000 Message-ID: <50A41AC8.4020301@psk31.plus.com> Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 22:27:20 +0000 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <50A40978.1060007@npton.plus.com> <50A409F0.9040609@psk31.plus.com> <50A416C5.9050400@kpnmail.nl> In-Reply-To: <50A416C5.9050400@kpnmail.nl> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Thanks Jan Perhaps conditions better as the night goes on -17dB is an improvement. Also I see no false de-codes. Eddie [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Scan-Signature: 027eb28428a0ed4e20e06b28d08cfc7b Subject: Re: LF: Fwd: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Now running 500khz + 1400 JT9-1 ver4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1dc14850a41af57940 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Thanks Jan Perhaps conditions better as the night goes on -17dB is an improvement. Also I see no false de-codes. Eddie On 14/11/2012 22:10, pa3abk wrote: > Eddie, > > It's difficult to tell whether their is an improvement. > Figs seems slightly better. (Using V4) > Meanwhile heavy QRN came up here peaking 9+20. > Your signal showed a slow QSB over the last 40min. > At 2126utc you disappeared in the noise and after that slowly > increasing with a peak at 2146utc > This is a visual observation in SL. > > The figures: > 2048 1 -24 0.2 1416. 0.0 G3ZJO TEST > 2058 10 -6 0.3 1406. 0.0 CQ OR7T JO20 > 2100 10 -8 0.2 1406. 0.0 CQ OR7T JO20 > 2104 3 -25 0.3 1416. 0.0 G3ZJO TEST > 2118 4 -25 0.1 1416. 0.0 G3ZJO TEST > 2120 3 -21 0.2 1417. 0.0 G3ZJO TEST > 2122 3 -21 0.1 1417. 0.0 G3ZJO TEST > 2132 3 -24 0.1 1417. 0.0 G3ZJO TEST > 2134 1 -22 0.2 1416. 0.0 G3ZJO TEST > 2136 2 -23 0.2 1417. 0.0 G3ZJO TEST > 2138 4 -25 0.2 1416. 0.0 G3ZJO TEST > 2140 4 -21 0.1 1416. 0.0 G3ZJO TEST > 2142 5 -22 0.1 1417. 0.0 G3ZJO TEST > 2144 9 -17 0.2 1416. 0.0 G3ZJO TEST > 2146 2 -18 0.1 1416. 0.0 G3ZJO TEST > 2148 8 -19 0.1 1417. 0.0 G3ZJO TEST > 2150 6 -20 0.2 1416. 0.0 G3ZJO TEST > 2154 8 -21 0.2 1417. 0.0 G3ZJO TEST > 2156 7 -22 0.2 1416. 0.0 G3ZJO TEST > 2158 3 -21 0.1 1417. 0.0 G3ZJO TEST > > 73's > Jan > > > > > > On 14-11-2012 22:15, g3zjo wrote: >> >> Some fairly consistent de-codes sent direct from PA3ABK best S/N >> -23dB using Ver3. >> >> I would be*very* pleased with one de-code from you Mauro. >> >> Eddie >> >> On 14/11/2012 20:57, IK1WVQ Mauro wrote: >>> >>> >>> Hi, >>> I am receiving @ 500KHz JT9-1 and OP4 and OP8 .. >>> No decodes for now... >>> >>> 73 de Mauro IK1WVQ JN44CB >>> >>> >>> At 21.06 14/11/12, you wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> First local de-code FB. >>>> >>>> Reports welcome of course. >>>> >>>> Eddie >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Nessun virus nel messaggio in arrivo. >>>> Controllato da AVG - www.avg.com >>>> Versione: 9.0.930 / Database dei virus: 2441.1.1/5394 - Data di >>>> rilascio: 11/14/12 08:34:00 >>> >>> >>> __._,_.___ >>> >>> >>> Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional >>> Change settings via the Web >>> >>> (Yahoo! ID required) >>> Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest >>> >>> | Switch to Fully Featured >>> >>> >>> Visit Your Group >>> >>> | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use >>> | Unsubscribe >>> >>> >>> >>> __,_._,___ >>> >>> No virus found in this message. >>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >>> Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2441/5394 - Release Date: >>> 11/14/12 >>> >> >> > >