Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-de05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 31A753800008D; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:35:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TYNBq-00047N-Bd for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 20:34:34 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TYNBp-00047E-Uh for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 20:34:33 +0000 Received: from eterpe-smout.broadpark.no ([80.202.8.16]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TYNBh-0000BN-Mi for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 20:34:32 +0000 Received: from ignis-smin.broadpark.no ([80.202.8.11]) by eterpe-smout.broadpark.no (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u3-15.01 64bit (built Feb 12 2010)) with ESMTP id <0MDG00KGY15CWV00@eterpe-smout.broadpark.no> for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 21:34:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([84.48.212.1]) by ignis-smin.broadpark.no (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u3-15.01 64bit (built Feb 12 2010)) with ESMTPA id <0MDG005OG15C46A0@ignis-smin.broadpark.no> for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 21:34:24 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 21:34:24 +0100 From: Steinar Aanesland In-reply-to: <50A2AD4E.8090606@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Message-id: <50A2AED0.1000700@broadpark.no> MIME-version: 1.0 References: <50A2A1B3.5050204@broadpark.no> <50A2AD4E.8090606@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2 X-Spam-Score: -0.9 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: DK7FC DK7FC DK7FC IN JN49 CQ DE DK7FC but I am probably too weak LA5VNA Steinar loc:JO59jq Mal and spam filtering: extremely STRONG www.opera.no [...] Content analysis details: (-0.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [80.202.8.16 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.2 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 5c335215f1b3de26d890ee84d49616ce Subject: Re: LF: Calling CQ on 472.800 in CW Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=LINES_OF_YELLING autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40cd50a2af061e42 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none DK7FC DK7FC DK7FC IN JN49 CQ DE DK7FC but I am probably too weak LA5VNA Steinar loc:JO59jq Mal and spam filtering: extremely STRONG www.opera.no Den 13.11.2012 21:27, skrev Stefan Sch=E4fer: > ...and i'm now calling on 472.3 kHz. > When looking into the DX-cluster it seems i've missed OK2BVG... >=20 > Just started, will try for at least 30 minutes, giving RX-stns a ch= ance. >=20 > 73, Stefan/DK7FC >=20 > PS: Are you receiving with the PC as well? >=20 >=20 > Am 13.11.2012 20:38, schrieb Steinar Aanesland: >> Well, I am using a computer so it is probably not the real ting.. >> >> >> >> =20 >=20 >=20 >=20