Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-db05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 010EF3800008B; Sat, 3 Nov 2012 13:19:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TUhMo-00019b-Fx for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 17:18:42 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TUhMn-00019S-W0 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 17:18:41 +0000 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TUhMm-0003L5-3p for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 17:18:40 +0000 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 03 Nov 2012 17:18:38 -0000 Received: from dtmd-4d054bb5.pool.mediaWays.net (EHLO [192.168.155.100]) [77.5.75.181] by mail.gmx.net (mp069) with SMTP; 03 Nov 2012 18:18:38 +0100 X-Authenticated: #43713913 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/3/eMpJd33SYNE9ltZdvEMhtKf4nJDFy0kzDY4GK dcT2AChYBUh8J9 Message-ID: <509551EE.5080304@gmx.com> Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2012 18:18:38 +0100 From: Jochen Althoff User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <002001cdb933$48e091c0$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>,<8CF8750D333E69E-18CC-3DAB@webmail-m129.sysops.aol.com>,<5094312D.9020905@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>,,<7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FB52560@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be> ,<000b01cdb9e4$1642a1c0$0201a8c0@marco09cqcdi12> In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: I can hear OM1II ufb 549 but he is still not hearing me.... :-( 73 df1vb Am 03.11.2012 18:09, schrieb Lubos OK2BVG: > Hello Marco! > TU for your report for Jaro, OM1II. Both, he and me are pleased :-) > > Now in QSO with Mal, G3KEV > > > Lubos, OK2BVG > > > From: marcocadeddu@tin.it > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 16:55:53 +0000 > Subject: Re: LF: OM1II > > 472700 audible cq in jn35tb > now! > 73 > IK1HSS > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Lubos OK2BVG > *To:* _RSGB_LF > *Sent:* Friday, November 02, 2012 9:20 PM > *Subject:* RE: LF: OM1II > > OK, Rik, we are QSX on 501.00 kHz for you now. > > > Lubos > > > > From: Rik.Strobbe@fys.kuleuven.be To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 21:11:53 +0000 > Subject: RE: LF: OM1II > > OM1II up to 579 here. QSX 501? > > 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T > > *Van:* owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > > [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] namens Lubos OK2BVG > [bvgbob@hotmail.com] > *Verzonden:* vrijdag 2 november 2012 21:55 > *To:* _RSGB_LF > *Onderwerp:* RE: LF: OM1II > > OK, Stefan, we are on 472.7kHz now. Try to call us. > > > Lubos > > > > Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 21:46:37 +0100 > From: Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: Re: LF: OM1II > > They are x band 80m :-( Called him several times and waited for a > long time... > Lubos, maybe you can advise a time slot where he is _not_ QSX ....? > > Also there is a narrow QRM line on exactly 472.5, as reported by > DF0WD too. This line is very strong today and often audible. I'll > spend some more time on 474.7 kHz which is clear here... > > 73, [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [213.165.64.23 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (althoff[at]gmx.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Scan-Signature: 60b21f5b7eb190e65b65540006a87038 Subject: Re: LF: OM1II Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40595095521b5545 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none I can hear OM1II ufb 549 but he is still not hearing me.... :-( 73 df1vb Am 03.11.2012 18:09, schrieb Lubos OK2BVG: > Hello Marco! > TU for your report for Jaro, OM1II. Both, he and me are pleased :-) > > Now in QSO with Mal, G3KEV > > > Lubos, OK2BVG > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > From: marcocadeddu@tin.it > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 16:55:53 +0000 > Subject: Re: LF: OM1II > > 472700 audible cq in jn35tb > now! > 73 > IK1HSS > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Lubos OK2BVG > *To:* _RSGB_LF > *Sent:* Friday, November 02, 2012 9:20 PM > *Subject:* RE: LF: OM1II > > OK, Rik, we are QSX on 501.00 kHz for you now. > > > Lubos > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > From: Rik.Strobbe@fys.kuleuven.be > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 21:11:53 +0000 > Subject: RE: LF: OM1II > > OM1II up to 579 here. QSX 501? > > 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *Van:* owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > > [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] namens Lubos OK2BVG > [bvgbob@hotmail.com] > *Verzonden:* vrijdag 2 november 2012 21:55 > *To:* _RSGB_LF > *Onderwerp:* RE: LF: OM1II > > OK, Stefan, we are on 472.7kHz now. Try to call us. > > > Lubos > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 21:46:37 +0100 > From: Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: Re: LF: OM1II > > They are x band 80m :-( Called him several times and waited for a > long time... > Lubos, maybe you can advise a time slot where he is _not_ QSX ....? > > Also there is a narrow QRM line on exactly 472.5, as reported by > DF0WD too. This line is very strong today and often audible. I'll > spend some more time on 474.7 kHz which is clear here... > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > > > Am 02.11.2012 21:36, schrieb Markus Vester: > > OM2II, G3KEV, DF0WD, EI0CF, all nicely audible here... > https://dl.dropbox.com/u/26404526/df6nm_MF.jpg > 73, Markus (DF6NM) > > > -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- > Von: mal hamilton > > An: rsgb > > Verschickt: Fr, 2 Nov 2012 7:51 pm > Betreff: LF: OM1II > > OM1II now active on 472 Khz 599 with me and just worked. xband 502 > Lots of NDB acty tonite also, condx seem vy good > Jado es Lubos doing a great job on the old ship > de mal/g3kev > -- -= DF1VB =- -= KH2MM =- Jochen Althoff +49 171 2001068 "The wireless telegraph is not difficult to understand. The ordinary telegraph is like a very long cat. You pull the tail in New York, and it meows in Los Angeles. The wireless is the same, only without the cat." (Albert Einstein)