Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mg04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 45C6D3800009E; Sat, 3 Nov 2012 08:27:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TUcnz-0007H6-Ur for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 12:26:27 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TUcnz-0007Gx-HD for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 12:26:27 +0000 Received: from out1.ip07ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.243]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TUcnx-00022a-Vb for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 12:26:26 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMBACwMlVACZMrS/2dsb2JhbAANN79ohnIBAQEBAzhRCwkPCRYPCQMCAQIBRRMIAQGvFpMljAEagn2DJQOVe5MzgWQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,705,1344207600"; d="scan'208";a="52753768" Received: from host-2-100-202-210.as13285.net (HELO [192.168.2.3]) ([2.100.202.210]) by out1.ip07ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 03 Nov 2012 12:26:24 +0000 Message-ID: <50950D6E.1060501@psk31.plus.com> Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2012 12:26:22 +0000 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <5094DB3E.9070809@npton.plus.com> <5094DC76.1000801@psk31.plus.com> <50950AA3.90001@kpnmail.nl> In-Reply-To: <50950AA3.90001@kpnmail.nl> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Jan Thank you very much, a very useful report. Not a bad signal for the time of day and only one minute send period passing a fair bit of information in that time. Such analysis would be difficult without digital modes. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Scan-Signature: c6a8ca7629fac3d35507e5a7fd3cbf17 Subject: Re: LF: Fwd: JT9-1 500 + 1400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60cc50950da25e84 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Jan Thank you very much, a very useful report. Not a bad signal for the time of day and only one minute send period passing a fair bit of information in that time. Such analysis would be difficult without digital modes. Eddie On 03/11/2012 12:14, pa3abk wrote: > Eddie, > > Sigs are vy faint here. > But the prg did decode some... Using r2713. > It's all on the edge of my receiving capabilities. > QRM below normal (heavy overcast killed sunpanels production of my > neighbour) > > 0924 0 -29 0.3 1406.10 0.00 start > 1008 4 -25 0.1 1399.52 0.00 G3ZJO TEST > 1012 2 -27 0.2 1399.69 0.00 G3ZJO TEST > 1018 5 -25 0.1 1399.90 0.00 G3ZJO TEST > > 1020 3 -26 0.1 1399.94 0.00 G3ZJO TEST > > 1022 3 -26 0.0 1400.08 0.00 G3ZJO TEST > > 1024 2 -27 0.1 1400.25 0.00 G3ZJO TEST > > 1042 4 -25 0.1 1400.63 0.00 G3ZJO TEST > > 1046 3 -26 0.0 1400.98 0.00 G3ZJO TEST > 1050 4 -25 0.0 1401.71 0.00 G3ZJO TEST > > 1102 5 -24 0.1 1401.75 0.00 G3ZJO TEST > > 1104 1 -27 0.1 1401.75 0.00 G3ZJO TEST > > 1108 4 -25 0.1 1401.96 0.00 G3ZJO TEST > 1112 1 -28 0.1 1402.06 0.00 G3ZJO TEST > > 1114 4 -25 0.1 1402.27 0.00 G3ZJO TEST > > 1128 2 -27 0.1 1402.10 0.00 G3ZJO TEST > > 1130 1 -28 0.1 1401.93 0.00 G3ZJO TEST > > 1200 0 -29 0.1 1402.83 0.00 last > > Assume you can figure out how many I missed view the interval of > beaconing choosen. > > Using divider/4 principle can't TX in this mode. (yet) > For WSPR I'm using a modified MP3 (shift 4x) and program scheduler, in > case you wondered why I can produce WSPR and not WSJT-x :-) > > 73's > Jan > > > NNNN > > > > On 3-11-2012 9:57, g3zjo wrote: >> I am currently testing JT9-1 on 500kHz dial +1400. >> At the moment please e-mail for QSO. >> >> Eddie >> >> > >