Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dd04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 1CAD0380000BE; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 19:06:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TU3pe-0003Na-7k for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 23:05:50 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TU3pd-0003NR-MZ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 23:05:49 +0000 Received: from out1.ip01ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.237]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TU3pb-00019C-UQ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 23:05:48 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApIBAJn/klBcGSwr/2dsb2JhbAANN8cUZRgWGAMCAQIBWAgBAbFBk3KPEoMkA5V4kzI X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,695,1344207600"; d="scan'208";a="408716248" Received: from host-92-25-44-43.as13285.net (HELO [192.168.2.3]) ([92.25.44.43]) by out1.ip01ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 01 Nov 2012 23:05:46 +0000 Message-ID: <5093004A.2050606@psk31.plus.com> Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 23:05:46 +0000 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Have installed Vr2713 Oh what a difference. Just had a proper QSO with OR7T who was no longer a huge reddish pink blot on the horizon. Now a reasonable looking trace for a station at the distance. Here is my recommended set up for this version on XP Machines. First run WSPR2 set the audio levels for 0dB this level is correct for Spectrum Lab, Fldigi, Slow Scan you name it. Now open WSJT-X the dB scale will be overloaded pull down the slider by the side to set the levels as indicated in the quick set up guide. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Scan-Signature: e90dcb17768c7e768f13e0721cc1c0c7 Subject: LF: WSJTX V02 r2713 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40905093009277c0 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Have installed Vr2713 Oh what a difference. Just had a proper QSO with OR7T who was no longer a huge reddish pink blot on the horizon. Now a reasonable looking trace for a station at the distance. Here is my recommended set up for this version on XP Machines. First run WSPR2 set the audio levels for 0dB this level is correct for Spectrum Lab, Fldigi, Slow Scan you name it. Now open WSJT-X the dB scale will be overloaded pull down the slider by the side to set the levels as indicated in the quick set up guide. Joe, the questions remains. Why do WSJT2.11 and WSJTX have such a strangely sensitive input. What we need now is the same slider or a return to normal Audio levels for the TX side it is overloaded by the same amount I would say. Where are all my "15P6715P67WCV "s missing them already. Eddie G3ZJO