Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-ma02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 097D0380000A3; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 16:22:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TU1H0-0002Wa-Hr for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 20:21:54 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TU1H0-0002WO-3a for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 20:21:54 +0000 Received: from ppa04.princeton.edu ([128.112.128.215]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TU1Gy-0000OA-7J for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 20:21:52 +0000 Received: from csgsmtp201l.Princeton.EDU (csgsmtp201l.Princeton.EDU [128.112.134.60]) by ppa04.Princeton.EDU (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qA1KLpnJ026869 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 16:21:51 -0400 Received: from [128.112.84.206] (phy-joe.Princeton.EDU [128.112.84.206]) (authenticated bits=0) by csgsmtp201l.Princeton.EDU (8.13.8/8.12.9) with ESMTP id qA1KLo6x004678 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 16:21:51 -0400 Message-ID: <5092D9DE.4020702@princeton.edu> Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 16:21:50 -0400 From: Joe Taylor User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <508D92BE.2040500@broadpark.no> <508ED047.1000504@broadpark.no> <508EEDA9.7070905@princeton.edu> <50901CB0.2040405@princeton.edu> <50917D09.2030908@princeton.edu>,<509299E8.7010608@princeton.edu> <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FB51FBE@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be> In-Reply-To: <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FB51FBE@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.7.7855,1.0.431,0.0.0000 definitions=2012-11-01_06:2012-11-01,2012-11-01,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=quarantine_notspam policy=quarantine score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=6.0.2-1203120001 definitions=main-1211010221 X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Yes, email is OK. Thanks! -- Joe On 11/1/2012 2:40 PM, Rik Strobbe wrote: > Hello Joe, > > > > from last night I have some wav files with strong static crashes that show a nice JT9-2 signal on the wide graph but do not decode. Is it OK to send the files to joe@Princeton.EDU or do you prefer another e-mail adress? > > > > 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T > > > > JT9 performance may be degraded in the presence of QRM, static crashes, plasma TV birdies, frequency drift, etc. Extensive experience with JT65 on both EME and HF paths shows that most of these annoyances can be minimized or eliminated by suitable optimizations in the receiving > software. These optimizations have not yet been started, in part because I do not yet have suitable examples of *.wav files recorded in > difficult receiving situations. > [...] Content analysis details: (-3.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [128.112.128.215 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 7aa9ad08848e488e22e0ff1d71f4ef1d Subject: Re: LF: RE: [rsgb_lf_group] Soundcard issues Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d600a5092da085fd5 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Yes, email is OK. Thanks! -- Joe On 11/1/2012 2:40 PM, Rik Strobbe wrote: > Hello Joe, > > > > from last night I have some wav files with strong static crashes that show a nice JT9-2 signal on the wide graph but do not decode. Is it OK to send the files to joe@Princeton.EDU or do you prefer another e-mail adress? > > > > 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T > > > > JT9 performance may be degraded in the presence of QRM, static crashes, plasma TV birdies, frequency drift, etc. Extensive experience with JT65 on both EME and HF paths shows that most of these annoyances can be minimized or eliminated by suitable optimizations in the receiving > software. These optimizations have not yet been started, in part because I do not yet have suitable examples of *.wav files recorded in > difficult receiving situations. >