Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mi03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 1AA7D38000134; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 12:58:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TTbbz-0004og-2U for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 16:57:51 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TTbby-0004oX-J9 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 16:57:50 +0000 Received: from out1.ip04ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.240]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TTbbw-0004zw-He for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 16:57:49 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApIBACI+kVBcGSjp/2dsb2JhbAANN8cTAQEBAQM4EUALCQsECSUPAkYTCAEBsGmTWot4gxeDJAOVdpMx X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,687,1344207600"; d="scan'208";a="389471845" Received: from host-92-25-40-233.as13285.net (HELO [192.168.2.5]) ([92.25.40.233]) by out1.ip04ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 31 Oct 2012 16:57:47 +0000 Message-ID: <509158AB.50506@psk31.plus.com> Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 16:58:19 +0000 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <50913785.1090003@psk31.plus.com> <50913A14.50200@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <50913FF1.9020500@psk31.plus.com> <509142F9.9040301@psk31.plus.com> <50914562.9060801@psk31.plus.com> <50914749.1070405@psk31.plus.com> <509148E0.4050705@psk31.plus.com> <50914ABF.1060601@psk31.plus.com> <50914CE4.5040509@psk31.plus.com> <5091508B.2010803@broadpark.no> <509152BF.7060102@broadpark.no> <50915397.4050004@broadpark.no> <509154EA.7050507@broadpark.no> In-Reply-To: <509154EA.7050507@broadpark.no> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: FB Steinar. :-) :-) :-) On 31/10/2012 16:42, Steinar Aanesland wrote: > Hi Eddie > > I am saving all the audio files now, if you or someone else need them. > > > LA5VNA Steinar > loc:JO59jq > Mal and spam filtering: STRONG > www.opera.no > > > > Den 31.10.2012 17:36, skrev Steinar Aanesland: >> 1632 5 -25 0.2 1439.79 0.00 DK7FC JN49QRP >> >> >> >> LA5VNA Steinar >> loc:JO59jq >> Mal and spam filtering: STRONG >> www.opera.no >> >> Den 31.10.2012 17:33, skrev Steinar Aanesland: >>> Wrong, there IS a very very weak signal in the waterfall. I will try to >>> decode it >>> >>> LA5VNA Steinar >>> loc:JO59jq >>> Mal and spam filtering: STRONG >>> www.opera.no >>> >>> Den 31.10.2012 17:23, skrev Steinar Aanesland: >>>> I am monitoring 137140 now but no signal in the waterfall >>>> >>>> LA5VNA Steinar >>>> loc:JO59jq >>>> Mal and spam filtering: STRONG >>>> www.opera.no >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Den 31.10.2012 17:08, skrev g3zjo: >>>>> 1556 weak failed to decode. >>>>> 1600 slight freq drift? failed decode >>>>> 1604 OK >>>>> >>>>> G8HUH consistent -22 to -18dB >>>>> >>>>> On 31/10/2012 15:58, g3zjo wrote: >>>>>> Sorry messed that LOC up >>>>>> >>>>>> 1546 10 -17 0.2 1449.37 0.00 L9MK-156N?WH4 >>>>>> 1548 7 -24 0.0 1436.13 0.00 DK7FC JN49QRP >>>>>> 1550 10 -15 0.1 1449.21 0.00 DK7FC G8HUH -12 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 31/10/2012 15:50, g3zjo wrote: >>>>>>> There is another station on 137.450 stated late decoded it later as >>>>>>> L9MK JN49QRP interesting. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 31/10/2012 15:44, g3zjo wrote: >>>>>>>> No de-code at 1536 visible frequency drift on your signal >>>>>>>> 1540 OK. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Eddie >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 31/10/2012 15:36, g3zjo wrote: >>>>>>>>> Hi Stefan >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Consistent results at this time. big file of reports later. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Eddie >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> No virus found in this message. >>>>>>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >>>>>>>> Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2441/5365 - Release Date: >>>>>>>> 10/31/12 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> No virus found in this message. >>>>>>> [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Scan-Signature: 85c54099682e8e65d9e25bf804a68673 Subject: Re: LF: Re: DK7FC 137.440 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d7b8b509158be47a9 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none FB Steinar. :-) :-) :-) On 31/10/2012 16:42, Steinar Aanesland wrote: > Hi Eddie > > I am saving all the audio files now, if you or someone else need them. > > > LA5VNA Steinar > loc:JO59jq > Mal and spam filtering: STRONG > www.opera.no > > > > Den 31.10.2012 17:36, skrev Steinar Aanesland: >> 1632 5 -25 0.2 1439.79 0.00 DK7FC JN49QRP >> >> >> >> LA5VNA Steinar >> loc:JO59jq >> Mal and spam filtering: STRONG >> www.opera.no >> >> Den 31.10.2012 17:33, skrev Steinar Aanesland: >>> Wrong, there IS a very very weak signal in the waterfall. I will try to >>> decode it >>> >>> LA5VNA Steinar >>> loc:JO59jq >>> Mal and spam filtering: STRONG >>> www.opera.no >>> >>> Den 31.10.2012 17:23, skrev Steinar Aanesland: >>>> I am monitoring 137140 now but no signal in the waterfall >>>> >>>> LA5VNA Steinar >>>> loc:JO59jq >>>> Mal and spam filtering: STRONG >>>> www.opera.no >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Den 31.10.2012 17:08, skrev g3zjo: >>>>> 1556 weak failed to decode. >>>>> 1600 slight freq drift? failed decode >>>>> 1604 OK >>>>> >>>>> G8HUH consistent -22 to -18dB >>>>> >>>>> On 31/10/2012 15:58, g3zjo wrote: >>>>>> Sorry messed that LOC up >>>>>> >>>>>> 1546 10 -17 0.2 1449.37 0.00 L9MK-156N?WH4 >>>>>> 1548 7 -24 0.0 1436.13 0.00 DK7FC JN49QRP >>>>>> 1550 10 -15 0.1 1449.21 0.00 DK7FC G8HUH -12 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 31/10/2012 15:50, g3zjo wrote: >>>>>>> There is another station on 137.450 stated late decoded it later as >>>>>>> L9MK JN49QRP interesting. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 31/10/2012 15:44, g3zjo wrote: >>>>>>>> No de-code at 1536 visible frequency drift on your signal >>>>>>>> 1540 OK. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Eddie >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 31/10/2012 15:36, g3zjo wrote: >>>>>>>>> Hi Stefan >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Consistent results at this time. big file of reports later. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Eddie >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> No virus found in this message. >>>>>>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >>>>>>>> Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2441/5365 - Release Date: >>>>>>>> 10/31/12 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> No virus found in this message. >>>>>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >>>>>>> Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2441/5365 - Release Date: >>>>>>> 10/31/12 >>>>>>> >>>>>> No virus found in this message. >>>>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >>>>>> Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2441/5365 - Release Date: 10/31/12 >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > > ----- > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2441/5365 - Release Date: 10/31/12 > >