Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-md06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id CD3BD38000092; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 09:38:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TTC0t-0001hJ-MV for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 13:37:51 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TTC0t-0001hA-3w for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 13:37:51 +0000 Received: from eterpe-smout.broadpark.no ([80.202.8.16]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TTC0q-0007pZ-Nz for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 13:37:50 +0000 Received: from ignis-smin.broadpark.no ([80.202.8.11]) by eterpe-smout.broadpark.no (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u3-15.01 64bit (built Feb 12 2010)) with ESMTP id <0MCP008OHKIYIOB0@eterpe-smout.broadpark.no> for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:37:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([84.48.212.1]) by ignis-smin.broadpark.no (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u3-15.01 64bit (built Feb 12 2010)) with ESMTPA id <0MCP001KKKIYDS50@ignis-smin.broadpark.no> for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:37:46 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:37:46 +0100 From: Steinar Aanesland In-reply-to: <8CF84A2D46CF8AF-FDC-4F78A@webmail-m161.sysops.aol.com> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Message-id: <508FD82A.4070202@broadpark.no> MIME-version: 1.0 References: <87D0548217184BC58AF939DEA4CF768C@intelp4> <8CF84A2D46CF8AF-FDC-4F78A@webmail-m161.sysops.aol.com> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1 X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Markus I had no luck with Stefan last evening , no asterisks and no echo 2315 5 -29 -0.8 1432.73 0.00 2320 10 -12 0.2 1439.73 0.00 2325 5 -29 0.4 1428.55 0.00 2330 10 -12 0.0 1439.73 0.00 2335 4 -30 0.0 1420.20 0.00 2340 10 -14 0.2 1439.73 0.00 2345 6 -29 0.2 1427.61 0.00 2350 10 -19 0.2 1439.73 0.00 2355 10 -23 0.4 1429.87 0.00 0000 10 -18 0.2 1439.73 0.00 0005 10 -25 0.0 1429.84 0.00 0010 10 -17 0.2 1439.73 0.00 0015 0 -33 0.9 1456.33 0.00 0020 10 -12 0.0 1439.73 0.00 0025 1 -33 0.0 1451.72 0.00 0030 10 -12 0.0 1439.73 0.00 0035 10 -26 0.2 1429.83 0.00 DF6NM GN ALL 0040 0 -34 0.4 1440.21 0.00 000AAA 000AAA RA90 [...] Content analysis details: (-1.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [80.202.8.16 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: d5ac66e7920295f519efeb68ecc59e6f Subject: Re: LF: RE: JT9-10 Decode DK7FC Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-transfer-encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=LINES_OF_YELLING autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d605a508fd8675892 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Markus I had no luck with Stefan last evening , no asterisks and no echo 2315 5 -29 -0.8 1432.73 0.00 2320 10 -12 0.2 1439.73 0.00 2325 5 -29 0.4 1428.55 0.00 2330 10 -12 0.0 1439.73 0.00 2335 4 -30 0.0 1420.20 0.00 2340 10 -14 0.2 1439.73 0.00 2345 6 -29 0.2 1427.61 0.00 2350 10 -19 0.2 1439.73 0.00 2355 10 -23 0.4 1429.87 0.00 0000 10 -18 0.2 1439.73 0.00 0005 10 -25 0.0 1429.84 0.00 0010 10 -17 0.2 1439.73 0.00 0015 0 -33 0.9 1456.33 0.00 0020 10 -12 0.0 1439.73 0.00 0025 1 -33 0.0 1451.72 0.00 0030 10 -12 0.0 1439.73 0.00 0035 10 -26 0.2 1429.83 0.00 DF6NM GN ALL 0040 0 -34 0.4 1440.21 0.00 000AAA 000AAA RA90 I managed to decode your signal even if it looks like you are slightly out of sync. https://dl.dropbox.com/u/16381257/capt14.jpg LA5VNA Steinar loc:JO59jq Mal and spam filtering: STRONG www.opera.no Den 30.10.2012 11:45, skrev Markus Vester: > Similar here, most (but not all) slots decoded successfully,=20 but mostly with asterisks. Strange that the quiet slots at odd ten minute multiples also achieved 10 sync points - perhaps the echo effect again? The first line went wrong only because my decoder was still set to 5 minutes. > =20 > Even with 1 Hz tolerance the CPU is getting pretty busy - maybe in = a future version we could select whether we want multiple decodes or = not? On one of my machines I can't use 48 kS/s for WSPR and WSJTx bec= ause that samplerate is too far off, so being able to choose between = 12 and 48 kS/s aquisition would also be useful. > =20 > Best 73, > Markus (DF6NM) > =20 > 0040 10 -24 -0.6 1940.53 0.00 000AAA 000AAA RA90 =20 > 0050 0 -37 0.0 1938.40 0.00 > 0100 10 -9 1.7 1939.83 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK =20 > 0110 10 -18 0.4 1939.83 0.00 > 0120********* 1.7 1939.83 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK =20 > 0130 10 -18 0.4 1939.83 0.00 > 0140********* 1.7 1939.83 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK =20 > 0150 10 -19 0.9 1939.85 0.00 > 0200********* 1.7 1939.83 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK =20 > 0210 10 -17 -1.3 1939.75 0.00 > 0220 10 -9 2.2 1939.83 0.00 > 0230 10 -20 0.9 1939.85 0.00 > 0240********* 1.3 1939.83 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK =20 > 0250 10 -17 0.4 1939.83 0.00 > 0300 10 -9 1.3 1939.83 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK =20 > 0310 10 -19 0.4 1939.83 0.00 > 0320********* 1.3 1939.83 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK =20 > 0330 10 -18 0.4 1939.83 0.00 > 0340********* 1.3 1939.83 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK =20 > 0350 10 -18 0.4 1939.83 0.00 > 0400********* 1.3 1939.83 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK =20 > 0410 10 -18 0.4 1939.83 0.00 > 0420********* 1.3 1939.83 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK =20 > 0430 10 -19 0.4 1939.83 0.00 > 0440********* 1.3 1939.83 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK =20 > 0450 10 -19 0.4 1939.83 0.00 > 0500********* 1.3 1939.83 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK =20 > 0510 10 -19 0.4 1939.83 0.00 > 0520********* 1.3 1939.83 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK =20 > 0530 10 -18 0.4 1939.83 0.00 > 0540********* 1.3 1939.83 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK =20 > 0550 10 -18 -1.7 1939.89 0.00 > 0600 2 -35 0.9 1939.85 0.00 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > -----Urspr=FCngliche Mitteilung-----=20 > Von: Terry GW0EZY <gw0ezy@sky.com> > An: rsgb_lf_group <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org> > Verschickt: Di, 30 Okt 2012 2:36 am > Betreff: LF: RE: JT9-10 Decode DK7FC >=20 > Decode OK but same again =96 Sync and dB values shown as **** (usua= lly indicates values exceed expected) > =20 > 0120********* 0.9 1138.38 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK > =20 > I have reduced the tolerance to +/- 10. I checked JT9-30 and the Wi= de Graph scale shifts again requiring another retune and increase of = FFT Bins/Pixel to get 1140 kHz on screen (136.3 + 1140) > =20 > 73 Terry > =20 >=20 > From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_grou= p@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Terry GW0EZY > Sent: 30 October 2012 01:14 > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: LF: JT9-10 Decode DK7FC >=20 > =20 > A decode of your JT9-10 transmission. I wonder why the Sync and dB = values are shown as **** ?? > =20 > 0100********* 0.4 1138.38 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK =20 > =20 > Waiting for JT9-30 ?? > =20 > I thought you would prefer to stay with BS =96 sigh! > =20 > 73 Terry > =20 >=20 > From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_grou= p@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Stefan Sch=E4fer > Sent: 30 October 2012 00:49 > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: Re: LF: DK7FC-DF6NM >=20 > =20 >=20 > Am 30.10.2012 01:41, schrieb Terry GW0EZY:=20 > Stefan getting regular decodes from you =96 every 10 minutes. Will = also try your JT9-10. Let us all know if another frequency offset is = required. >=20 > No, i'll stay at 137.44 kHz over the night. >=20 >=20 > =20 > Sending emails is a pain! > Is it? I like it :-) >=20 >=20 > 73, Stefan >=20 >=20