Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mh04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id B533E38000087; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 17:32:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TSaPW-0000XL-JS for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 21:28:46 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TSaPW-0000XC-3o for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 21:28:46 +0000 Received: from mout2.freenet.de ([195.4.92.92]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (UNKNOWN:AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TSaPU-0003bH-Hi for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 21:28:45 +0000 Received: from [195.4.92.141] (helo=mjail1.freenet.de) by mout2.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1TSaPT-0001uA-Ba for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 22:28:43 +0100 Received: from localhost ([::1]:59014 helo=mjail1.freenet.de) by mjail1.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1TSaPT-0000C4-7H for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 22:28:43 +0100 Received: from [195.4.92.13] (port=39378 helo=3.mx.freenet.de) by mjail1.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1TSaN2-00081z-QE for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 22:26:12 +0100 Received: from blfd-4d088a3f.pool.mediaways.net ([77.8.138.63]:1906 helo=[192.168.178.21]) by 3.mx.freenet.de with esmtpsa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (port 465) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1TSaN2-0006rs-JH for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 22:26:12 +0100 Message-ID: <508DA2F3.20400@freenet.de> Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 22:26:11 +0100 From: wolf_dl4yhf User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <508D47B2.8060209@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <46A9A1D9FC954A658216B197782524BF@White> <891CD59233F844C283BAC09A2AAA04BA@White> <508D6A9D.4020600@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <508D6C1A.7050607@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <508D8084.6020501@freenet.de> <508D8295.8010604@broadpark.no> <508D84F0.1000706@freenet.de> <508D87C4.9030808@broadpark.no> <1351458186.87962.YahooMailNeo@web133201.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <1351458186.87962.YahooMailNeo@web133201.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Pete, Am 28.10.2012 22:03, schrieb M0FMT: > Hi All > > also NDB "BIA" 474 Rzeszow / Jasionka at 1000miles better Lower > sideband than upper sb? ah, confirmed... I thought I was the only one where "BIA" showed this behaviour. First blamed it on my receiver's passband, but then noticed the same happened with a Perseus and an SDR-IQ. But I think they add both sidebands 'synthetically', not with an old-fashioned AM modulator (with audio modulation transformer or similar). [...] Content analysis details: (-0.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [195.4.92.92 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dl4yhf[at]freenet.de) -0.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 896f9ee4f10c5db37812c155e804756d Subject: Re: LF: DJ9!E and DF5QG CW 0n 472.5 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------040405030906020603060303" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60d8508da45179f4 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------040405030906020603060303 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Pete, Am 28.10.2012 22:03, schrieb M0FMT: > Hi All > > also NDB "BIA" 474 Rzeszow / Jasionka at 1000miles better Lower > sideband than upper sb? ah, confirmed... I thought I was the only one where "BIA" showed this behaviour. First blamed it on my receiver's passband, but then noticed the same happened with a Perseus and an SDR-IQ. But I think they add both sidebands 'synthetically', not with an old-fashioned AM modulator (with audio modulation transformer or similar). 73, Wolf (qrt on LF / WSJT) --------------040405030906020603060303 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi Pete,

Am 28.10.2012 22:03, schrieb M0FMT:
Hi All
 

 also NDB "BIA" 474 Rzeszow / Jasionka at 1000miles better Lower sideband than upper sb?

ah, confirmed...  I thought I was the only one where "BIA" showed this behaviour. First blamed it on my receiver's passband, but then noticed the same happened with a Perseus and an SDR-IQ. But I think they add both sidebands 'synthetically', not with an old-fashioned AM modulator (with audio modulation transformer or similar).

73,
 Wolf (qrt on LF / WSJT)


--------------040405030906020603060303--