Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dc04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 9126E3800009F; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 13:19:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TSWVR-0005pl-1H for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 17:18:37 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TSWVQ-0005pc-Bb for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 17:18:36 +0000 Received: from mout2.freenet.de ([195.4.92.92]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (UNKNOWN:AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TSWVO-00024s-9v for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 17:18:35 +0000 Received: from [195.4.92.142] (helo=mjail2.freenet.de) by mout2.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1TSWVN-0004tA-8w for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 18:18:33 +0100 Received: from localhost ([::1]:41920 helo=mjail2.freenet.de) by mjail2.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1TSWVN-0003zr-3D for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 18:18:33 +0100 Received: from [195.4.92.22] (port=48984 helo=12.mx.freenet.de) by mjail2.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1TSWTJ-0003RH-1A for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 18:16:25 +0100 Received: from blfd-4d088a3f.pool.mediaways.net ([77.8.138.63]:1325 helo=[192.168.178.22]) by 12.mx.freenet.de with esmtpsa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (port 465) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1TSWTI-0007gC-Kz for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 18:16:24 +0100 Message-ID: <508D6867.6080704@freenet.de> Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 18:16:23 +0100 From: wolf_dl4yhf User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <8CF833625ACA143-1C88-18240@webmail-m054.sysops.aol.com> <8CF8338C31A31D2-188C-47031@Webmail-m118.sysops.aol.com> <508D5EC8.6050901@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <508D6171.90108@freenet.de> <508D63D5.8010903@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <508D63D5.8010903@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Stefan and all, Indeed, there was a second signal on a slightly different frequency which did seem to answer. But no decode on his signal (from JO31?) here as well. Need to check the sampling rate of the 2nd-hand mini laptop carried home from Hannover yesterday. I guess wsjt-x either samples directly at 12000 samples/second, or at 48000 and then decimates by four. Forgive me Joe, I didn't read the nice documentation yet. Will run Spectrum Lab at different sampling rates, connected to an OCXO divided down to audio range, and see what the trouble is. Alternatively (later) I will try the FiFi-SDR as a replacement, but some modifications in SL are necessary so it can modify the VFO frequency through the ExtIO_Si570.dll interface. Oh, I'd love to have a version of WSJT which is capable of using an ExtIO-DLL for input. This would allow using Perseus or SDR-IQ directly.. but that totally o.t. now. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [195.4.92.92 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dl4yhf[at]freenet.de) -0.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 571129b349252c35b2bc09d7a1c6d0f3 Subject: Re: LF: no decodes, help needed Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050400020908090400090000" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNKNOWN,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4084508d691e73c2 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050400020908090400090000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Stefan and all, Indeed, there was a second signal on a slightly different frequency which did seem to answer. But no decode on his signal (from JO31?) here as well. Need to check the sampling rate of the 2nd-hand mini laptop carried home from Hannover yesterday. I guess wsjt-x either samples directly at 12000 samples/second, or at 48000 and then decimates by four. Forgive me Joe, I didn't read the nice documentation yet. Will run Spectrum Lab at different sampling rates, connected to an OCXO divided down to audio range, and see what the trouble is. Alternatively (later) I will try the FiFi-SDR as a replacement, but some modifications in SL are necessary so it can modify the VFO frequency through the ExtIO_Si570.dll interface. Oh, I'd love to have a version of WSJT which is capable of using an ExtIO-DLL for input. This would allow using Perseus or SDR-IQ directly.. but that totally o.t. now. CUL, Wolf . Am 28.10.2012 17:56, schrieb Stefan Schäfer: > Hi Wolf, > > Appeared? That looks like you saw it in a spectrogram but got no decode. > Someone seems to answer to my call but i get no decode GRRR! > > Thanks for watching! > > 73, Stefan > > Am 28.10.2012 17:46, schrieb wolf_dl4yhf: >> RRR Stefan. Guess that was your signal, which appeared broader than >> Markus' earlier on. >> Hmm... did I send the previous msg here or on the other group ? ... >> Anyways, I keep monitoring in JT9-2 from now on, and see what >> happens. Terrible local QRM here by the way, the "buzzing" type. But >> too cold for spending the evening at the club station. >> >> 73, >> Wolf . >> >> Am 28.10.2012 17:35, schrieb Stefan Schäfer: >>> Now i'm on air in JT9-1. >>> Does someone get a decode? >>> I can neither decode my own signal nor the (strong!) signals of >>> others :-( >>> >>> Maybe it is a timing problem. As long as JT9 is limited to an >>> input/output frequency range of 0...2 kHz i have to use VAC and SL, >>> which may cause a certain time delay that might be critical in JT9-1 :-( >>> >>> I try to continue in JT9-2 now. Maybe here it works... >>> >>> 73, Stefan/DK7FC >>> >>> PS: Yes, i've been going through the restart sequence as well... >>> >>> >>> Am 28.10.2012 16:33, schrieb Markus Vester: >>>> hmmm, ths is what it looks like here... >>>> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/26404526/jt9-2_pa0a_nodecode.png >>>> >>>> 73, Markus >>>> >>>> -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- >>>> Von: Markus Vester >>>> An: rsgb_lf_group >>>> Verschickt: So, 28 Okt 2012 4:16 pm >>>> Betreff: Re: LF: no decodes, help needed >>>> >>>> Hi, Albert, >>>> thanks for trying! Got 8 "sync-points" and correct freq readout but >>>> no message from you, no idea why. >>>> Attempting JT9-1 now on 137420. >>>> 73, Markus >>>> >>>> >>>> -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- >>>> Von: Albert W > >>>> An: rsgb_lf_group >>> > >>>> Verschickt: So, 28 Okt 2012 3:11 pm >>>> Betreff: Re: LF: no decodes, help needed >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Hello Markus, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Received your CQ JT9-2 twice @ 1452 and 1456 and I responded a couple >>>> >>>> of times but nothing more from ur side. >>>> >>>> report was -17 dB. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Albert PA0A >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >> --------------050400020908090400090000 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Hi Stefan and all,

Indeed, there was a second signal on a slightly different frequency which did seem to answer. But no decode on his signal (from JO31?) here as well.
Need to check the sampling rate of the 2nd-hand mini laptop carried home from Hannover yesterday. I guess wsjt-x either samples directly at 12000 samples/second, or at 48000 and then decimates by four. Forgive me Joe, I didn't read the nice documentation yet.
Will run Spectrum Lab at different sampling rates, connected to an OCXO divided down to audio range, and see what the trouble is. Alternatively (later) I will try the FiFi-SDR as a replacement, but some modifications in SL are necessary so it can modify the VFO frequency through the ExtIO_Si570.dll interface. Oh, I'd love to have a version of WSJT which is capable of using an ExtIO-DLL for input. This would allow using Perseus or SDR-IQ directly.. but that totally o.t. now.

CUL,
  Wolf .

Am 28.10.2012 17:56, schrieb Stefan Schäfer:
Hi Wolf,

Appeared? That looks like you saw it in a spectrogram but got no decode.
Someone seems to answer to my call but i get no decode GRRR!

Thanks for watching!

73, Stefan

Am 28.10.2012 17:46, schrieb wolf_dl4yhf:
RRR Stefan. Guess that was your signal, which appeared broader than Markus' earlier on.
Hmm... did I send the previous msg here or on the other group ? ... Anyways, I keep monitoring in JT9-2 from now on, and see what happens. Terrible local QRM here by the way, the "buzzing" type. But too cold for spending the evening at the club station.

73,
  Wolf .

Am 28.10.2012 17:35, schrieb Stefan Schäfer:
Now i'm on air in JT9-1.
Does someone get a decode?
I can neither decode my own signal nor the (strong!) signals of others :-(

Maybe it is a timing problem. As long as JT9 is limited to an input/output frequency range of 0...2 kHz i have to use VAC and SL, which may cause a certain time delay that might be critical in JT9-1 :-(

I try to continue in JT9-2 now. Maybe here it works...

73, Stefan/DK7FC

PS: Yes, i've been going through the restart sequence as well...


Am 28.10.2012 16:33, schrieb Markus Vester:
hmmm, ths is what it looks like here...

73, Markus

 
-----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: Markus Vester <markusvester@aol.com>
An: rsgb_lf_group <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Verschickt: So, 28 Okt 2012 4:16 pm
Betreff: Re: LF: no decodes, help needed

Hi, Albert,
 
thanks for trying! Got 8 "sync-points" and correct freq readout but no message from you, no idea why.
 
Attempting JT9-1 now on 137420.
 
73, Markus


-----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: Albert W <westberg@xs4all.nl>
An: rsgb_lf_group <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Verschickt: So, 28 Okt 2012 3:11 pm
Betreff: Re: LF: no decodes, help needed




Hello Markus, 

  

 Received your CQ JT9-2 twice @ 1452 and 1456 and I responded  a couple  

 of times but nothing more from ur side. 

 report was -17 dB. 

  

 Albert PA0A


--------------050400020908090400090000--