Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-de06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 25AE038000083; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 16:49:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TMlrD-0006yX-0K for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 21:29:19 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TMlrC-0006yO-Ft for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 21:29:18 +0100 Received: from elvis.franken.de ([193.175.24.41]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TMlrA-0005MF-ED for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 21:29:17 +0100 Received: from uucp by elvis.franken.de with local-rmail (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1TMlr9-0007Zg-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 22:29:15 +0200 Received: from [192.168.1.161] (unknown [192.168.1.161]) by mbsks.zwiebeltuete.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 391464480AB for ; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 22:22:11 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <50787B7E.2070709@mbsks.franken.de> Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 22:20:14 +0200 From: Roland Bruestle User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120604 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <50689DAD.9030205@broadpark.no> <5068ACAF.2040007@mbsks.franken.de> <5068B151.2070200@broadpark.no> In-Reply-To: <5068B151.2070200@broadpark.no> X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Steinar, do you like to a test with slowWSPR? We want to compare WSPR 2Min against SlowWSPR 8Min. I thought we should do a start test. I'm transmitting normal WSPR and Slow WSPR-2 to the same time. This cane seen with normal WSPR. If this will be ok, than we know the transmision is ok. After this I'm transmitting normal WSPR and Slow WSPR-8. Than we can see the SNR change. My be -6dB. I'm transmitting now: normal WSPR on 47585Hz Slow WSPR-2 on 47575Hz [...] Content analysis details: (-2.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [193.175.24.41 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -2.1 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: b42857a5fad6e32377447282c21f62b1 Subject: Re: LF: log from wspring on 600m Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------040605040203040106040802" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE, LINES_OF_YELLING autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40ce5078825c7e97 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------040605040203040106040802 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hello Steinar, do you like to a test with slowWSPR? We want to compare WSPR 2Min against SlowWSPR 8Min. I thought we should do a start test. I'm transmitting normal WSPR and Slow WSPR-2 to the same time. This cane seen with normal WSPR. If this will be ok, than we know the transmision is ok. After this I'm transmitting normal WSPR and Slow WSPR-8. Than we can see the SNR change. My be -6dB. I'm transmitting now: normal WSPR on 47585Hz Slow WSPR-2 on 47575Hz Please listen if you are interested. Give me report. Grüße Roland Am 30.09.2012 22:53, schrieb Steinar Aanesland: > Great, I am looking forward to copy you in slowWSPR :) > > I have plans to make my own transmitter, but until then I will stay > RXing . > > La5vna > > > Den 30.09.2012 22:33, skrev Roland Bruestle: >> Hi Steinar, >> I'm on blacksheep. >> Yes I'm interested on using wsper-8 or wspr-32. >> I talked already with Markus. May bee he told this to you. >> He gave me his soft ware. I have to install it now. >> When I'm ready I will contact you via blacksheep. >> I may take some days. >> >> Roland >> >> >> Am 30.09.2012 21:29, schrieb Steinar Aanesland: >>> I ma not sure if you are on blacksheep or yahoo so this goes to both >>> groups. >>> >>> Have you considered using wsper-8 or wspr-32 on MF? >>> >>> >>> 1912 -31 -0.5 0.501469 0 DG3LV JO53 43 >>> 1912 -21 0.9 0.501543 0 DL3NDR JN59 27 >>> 1914 -23 1.0 0.501543 0 DL3NDR JN59 27 >>> 1916 -23 -1.7 0.501543 0 DL3NDR JN59 27 >>> 1918 -26 -0.3 0.501469 0 DG3LV JO53 43 >>> >> >> > > > -- > LA5VNA Steinar > loc:jo59jq > www.opera.no --------------040605040203040106040802 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hello Steinar,
do you like to a test with slowWSPR?
We want to compare WSPR 2Min against SlowWSPR 8Min.
I thought we should do a start  test.
I'm transmitting normal WSPR and Slow WSPR-2 to the same time. This cane seen with normal WSPR.
If this will be ok, than we know the transmision is ok.
After this I'm transmitting normal WSPR and Slow WSPR-8. Than we can see the SNR change. My be -6dB.
I'm transmitting now:
normal WSPR on 47585Hz
Slow WSPR-2 on 47575Hz

Please listen if you are interested. Give me report.

Grüße
Roland



Am 30.09.2012 22:53, schrieb Steinar Aanesland:
Great, I am looking forward to copy you in slowWSPR :)

I have plans to make my own transmitter, but until then I will stay RXing .

La5vna 


Den 30.09.2012 22:33, skrev Roland Bruestle:
Hi Steinar,
I'm on blacksheep.
Yes I'm interested on using wsper-8 or wspr-32.
I talked already with Markus. May bee he told this to you.
He gave me his soft ware. I have to install it now.
When I'm ready I will contact you via blacksheep.
I may take some days.

Roland


Am 30.09.2012 21:29, schrieb Steinar Aanesland:
I ma not sure if you are on blacksheep or yahoo so this goes to both
groups.

Have you considered using wsper-8 or wspr-32 on MF?


1912 -31 -0.5   0.501469  0 DG3LV JO53 43
1912 -21  0.9   0.501543  0 DL3NDR JN59 27
1914 -23  1.0   0.501543  0 DL3NDR JN59 27
1916 -23 -1.7   0.501543  0 DL3NDR JN59 27
1918 -26 -0.3   0.501469  0 DG3LV JO53 43





-- 
LA5VNA Steinar
loc:jo59jq
www.opera.no


--------------040605040203040106040802--