Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25])
by mtain-me02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id AC0D138000090;
Sat, 8 Sep 2012 19:01:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
id 1TAU1P-00024Z-Ma
for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 09 Sep 2012 00:01:03 +0100
Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
id 1TAU1P-00024Q-6X
for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 09 Sep 2012 00:01:03 +0100
Received: from mout1.freenet.de ([195.4.92.91])
by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (UNKNOWN:AES256-GCM-SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.77)
(envelope-from <dl4yhf@freenet.de>)
id 1TAU1N-0006pU-IU
for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 09 Sep 2012 00:01:02 +0100
Received: from [195.4.92.140] (helo=mjail0.freenet.de)
by mout1.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.76 #1)
id 1TAU1M-0007Od-9D
for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 09 Sep 2012 01:01:00 +0200
Received: from localhost ([::1]:40076 helo=mjail0.freenet.de)
by mjail0.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (Exim 4.76 #1)
id 1TAU1M-0000L2-5C
for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 09 Sep 2012 01:01:00 +0200
Received: from [195.4.92.10] (port=37112 helo=0.mx.freenet.de)
by mjail0.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (Exim 4.76 #1)
id 1TATyw-0008Ae-7H
for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 09 Sep 2012 00:58:30 +0200
Received: from blfd-4db02ab4.pool.mediaways.net ([77.176.42.180]:2459 helo=[192.168.178.22])
by 0.mx.freenet.de with esmtpsa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (port 465) (Exim 4.76 #1)
id 1TATyw-0003lN-0q
for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 09 Sep 2012 00:58:30 +0200
Message-ID: <504BCD96.2010901@freenet.de>
Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2012 00:58:30 +0200
From: wolf_dl4yhf <dl4yhf@freenet.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <12fe8.4c562f1.3d7d1434@aol.com> <504BC546.2000105@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <504BC546.2000105@gmail.com>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: John, you wrote: > Calling CQ ad infinitum, while also 60Hz
higher I also copy DF0WD calling CQ too. I assume neither station can hear
each other? < [...]
Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no
trust
[195.4.92.91 listed in list.dnswl.org]
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(dl4yhf[at]freenet.de)
0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain
X-Scan-Signature: 4b5b5ebe37a4c4f430f59bc35c1947b0
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: Re: DK0SWF antenna
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
x-aol-global-disposition: G
x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d608a504bce5f6011
X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25
X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none
John,
you wrote:
>
Calling CQ ad infinitum, while also 60Hz higher I also copy DF0WD
calling CQ too. I assume neither station can hear each other?
<
Of course I could hear DK0SWF calling CQ about 100 Hz away. But I had
given up, finally, after trying for the umpteenth time to get a response
from them. As Mal and others already noted, their signal was incredibly
strong, but they must have had a very, very serious problem with their
receiver. Maybe they should have asked the SWF (Südwestfunk) to close
down some of the transmitters in their vincinity ? Oh well. Hope the
pilots in Poland were not too irritated by the powerful signal, which
even beat DK7FC's signal by far !
Despite all the trouble, I was positively surprised to make a QSO with
OM1II, whom I heard earlier on, but didn't want to add to the confusion
on the semi-official "calling frequency" (472.5 kHz). Also thanks to
G3KEV, DK8KW, DJ2LF, and DF5QF for the nice QSOs. OZ7FOC was partly
audible, but difficult tonight.
73,
Wolf DL4YHF / DF0WD
>
> While I applaud any new MF activity, I wonder why, if DK0SWF are
> unable to receive efficiently on their antenna, they call CQ?
>
> Surely if this is a "one time" opportunity to transmit from "SWF" and
> reception is impossible they could do something else with the time on
> the air. A WSPR transmission for the same length of time would gather
> much more usefuly information than calling CQ with no hope of hearing
> any replies?
>
> John
> GM4SLV
> IP90gg
> Shetland Isles
>
>
>
>