Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25])
	by mtain-mb01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 55D4738001ADA;
	Sat,  8 Sep 2012 16:02:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
	id 1TARE5-0008UK-2C
	for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2012 21:01:57 +0100
Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
	by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
	id 1TARE4-0008UB-Kd
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2012 21:01:56 +0100
Received: from cpsmtpb-ews10.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.39.15])
	by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77)
	(envelope-from <pa3abk@kpnmail.nl>)
	id 1TARE2-000626-Vx
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2012 21:01:55 +0100
Received: from cpsps-ews26.kpnxchange.com ([10.94.84.192]) by cpsmtpb-ews10.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675);
	 Sat, 8 Sep 2012 22:01:54 +0200
Received: from CPSMTPM-CMT108.kpnxchange.com ([195.121.3.24]) by cpsps-ews26.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.17514);
	 Sat, 8 Sep 2012 22:01:54 +0200
Received: from [192.168.2.13] ([62.131.23.134]) by CPSMTPM-CMT108.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.0.6002.18264);
	 Sat, 8 Sep 2012 22:01:54 +0200
Message-ID: <504BA431.2090003@kpnmail.nl>
Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2012 22:01:53 +0200
From: pa3abk <pa3abk@kpnmail.nl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/15.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <504B9F8F.6000201@kpnmail.nl> <07F0FEFDA2154B19BBBDA18DD7B7A2F2@W1KW>
In-Reply-To: <07F0FEFDA2154B19BBBDA18DD7B7A2F2@W1KW>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Sep 2012 20:01:54.0088 (UTC) FILETIME=[CB035280:01CD8DFC]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has
 identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
 has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 Content preview:  Which explains :-) Trust his receiver can cope with high input
    with such an array. Just now he gave his CS and peaking 9+20 which is very
    strong considering the distance 325km. Jan/pa3abk On 8-9-2012 21:50, Holger
    'Geri', DK8KW - DI2BO - W1KW wrote: > Jan, > > According to Rudi, DK7PE,
   the group should be qrv all night. SWF > stands for Suedwestfunk, which is
    one of the German public radio > services in Mainz, so probably they "hijacked"
    one of their MF > transmitting antennas for the night ;) > > 73 > > Geri,
    DK8KW > > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "pa3abk" <pa3abk@kpnmail.nl>
    > To: "blacksheep" <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org> > Sent: Saturday, September
    08, 2012 9:42 PM > Subject: LF: DK0SWF antenna > > >> Scanning the CW band
    472-7kHz a strong, I mean very strong signal >> was heard from DK0SWF on
   472,5. >> He was listening mostly on 80m. >> At 1930 he was QRT signing of
    after a short QSX 503. >> Didn't manage to work him :-( >> >> Checked internet
    and his location was here : >> http://no.nonsense.ee/qthmap/?qth=JN49AV60ER
    >> Looking to the sat picture a "large" antenna was showed, which >> explained
    the strong sigs. >> >> If you are reading this reflector, do you really use
    this array? >> >> >> Jan/pa3abk >> >> -- >> pa3abk <-> dordrecht jo21it >>
    >> > > > [...] 
 Content analysis details:   (0.0 points, 5.0 required)
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no
                             trust
                             [213.75.39.15 listed in list.dnswl.org]
X-Scan-Signature: c9d6a1e47761f7ec7375ac340bef30d0
Subject: Re: LF: Re: DK0SWF antenna
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
x-aol-global-disposition: G
x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d6015504ba4721bcc
X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25
X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none


Which explains :-)
Trust his receiver can cope with high input with such an array.
Just now he gave his CS and peaking 9+20 which is very strong 
considering the distance 325km.
Jan/pa3abk



On 8-9-2012 21:50, Holger 'Geri', DK8KW - DI2BO - W1KW wrote:
> Jan,
>
> According to Rudi, DK7PE, the group should be qrv all night. SWF 
> stands for Suedwestfunk, which is one of the German public radio 
> services in Mainz, so probably they "hijacked" one of their MF 
> transmitting antennas for the night ;)
>
> 73
>
> Geri, DK8KW
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "pa3abk" <pa3abk@kpnmail.nl>
> To: "blacksheep" <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
> Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2012 9:42 PM
> Subject: LF: DK0SWF antenna
>
>
>> Scanning the CW band 472-7kHz a strong,  I mean very strong signal 
>> was heard from DK0SWF on 472,5.
>> He was listening mostly on 80m.
>> At 1930 he was QRT signing of after a short QSX 503.
>> Didn't manage to work him :-(
>>
>> Checked internet and his location was here : 
>> http://no.nonsense.ee/qthmap/?qth=JN49AV60ER
>> Looking to the sat picture a "large" antenna was showed, which 
>> explained the strong sigs.
>>
>> If you are reading this reflector, do you really use this array?
>>
>>
>> Jan/pa3abk
>>
>> -- 
>> pa3abk <-> dordrecht jo21it
>>
>>
>
>
>


-- 
pa3abk <-> dordrecht jo21it