Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dh06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 6BE9038000095; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 19:38:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1T5mOQ-0006Hh-Er for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 00:37:22 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1T5mOP-0006HY-Ob for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 00:37:21 +0100 Received: from mta31.charter.net ([216.33.127.82]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1T5mON-0006dC-Og for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 00:37:20 +0100 Received: from imp11 ([10.20.200.11]) by mta31.charter.net (InterMail vM.8.01.05.02 201-2260-151-103-20110920) with ESMTP id <20120826233716.XCTM24708.mta31.charter.net@imp11> for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 19:37:16 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.10] ([24.183.155.104]) by imp11 with smtp.charter.net id rbdG1j00D2FR9qG05bdGZ1; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 19:37:16 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=Mv9Cy8NsQItTEAHnXr6fCNbI23lcrkmyMeqLv9HU3yU= c=1 sm=1 a=DKcI9XZsuF4A:10 a=yUnIBFQkZM0A:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=RWZpgwfn1CcA:10 a=k9rhMujQtVdkIhoT5l68iA==:17 a=EQikoBG59VicT17RYmwA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=k9rhMujQtVdkIhoT5l68iA==:117 Message-ID: <503AB534.3010908@charter.net> Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 19:45:56 -0400 From: John Andrews User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <503A440D.7010708@charter.net> <659123F78B2D4C23AD703D8AC90631B7@F6CNIPCShack> <503A93E9.6010006@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <503A93E9.6010006@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> X-Spam-Score: -0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Stephan, I'm using a vertical loop, along the same idea as Warren's. It would not work well toward YV. John, W1TAG/WD2XES [...] Content analysis details: (-0.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [216.33.127.82 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.2 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 7b4dbd93955117b98f3a6ac4d7602f88 Subject: Re: LF: WD2XES Opera 32 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d411a503ab37c453d X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Stephan, I'm using a vertical loop, along the same idea as Warren's. It would not work well toward YV. John, W1TAG/WD2XES