Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-da04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 106F4380000AD; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 11:15:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1T5I4R-0007vM-5X for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 16:14:43 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1T5I4Q-0007vD-Je for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 16:14:42 +0100 Received: from smtpa1.mediabeam.com ([194.25.41.13]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1T5I4O-0000kE-Bc for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 16:14:41 +0100 Received: from IMAP1 (balancer7.mediabeam.com [10.100.1.80]) by smtpa1.mediabeam.com (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q7PFEdFT020204 for ; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 17:14:39 +0200 Received: from [192.168.178.33] (37-4-36-228-dynip.superkabel.de [37.4.36.228] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by smtpa.mediabeam.com (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q7PFEcZ8017039 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 17:14:38 +0200 X-mediaBEAM-Originating-IP: [37.4.36.228] X-mediaBEAM-AUTHID: [DK1IS@kabelmail.de] Message-ID: <5038EBED.50101@kabelmail.de> Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 17:14:53 +0200 From: DK1IS User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello dear LF-group, does anyone have proven experiences about * modification of TS 950 SD for transmitting CW on MF, perhaps LF too ("general coverage transmission" already realized) * the same for TS 50 S, * overriding the permanent ALC at TS 50 S ? [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [194.25.41.13 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 5f132ffce194fb93f2267a462d849f2b Subject: LF: Modifications of Kenwood TS 950 SD and TS 50 S Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020001040903090400090706" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d404c5038ec2d7bac X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------020001040903090400090706 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello dear LF-group, does anyone have proven experiences about * modification of TS 950 SD for transmitting CW on MF, perhaps LF too ("general coverage transmission" already realized) * the same for TS 50 S, * overriding the permanent ALC at TS 50 S ? As usual, there were no answers on my inquiries to Kenwood - neither from the German office nor from Japan ;-) Tu es 73, Tom, DK1IS --------------020001040903090400090706 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello dear LF-group,

does anyone have proven experiences about
  • modification of TS 950 SD for transmitting CW on MF, perhaps LF too ("general coverage transmission" already realized)
  • the same for TS 50 S,
  • overriding the permanent ALC at TS 50 S ?
As usual, there were no answers on my inquiries to Kenwood - neither from the German office nor from Japan ;-)

Tu es 73,
Tom, DK1IS --------------020001040903090400090706--