Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mh03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id F41EC38000090; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 11:53:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SrA50-0006gX-BI for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 16:52:54 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SrA4z-0006gO-Pf for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 16:52:53 +0100 Received: from smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl ([194.109.24.24]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SrA4y-0002fR-4M for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 16:52:52 +0100 Received: from [10.0.0.167] (a80-101-33-132.adsl.xs4all.nl [80.101.33.132]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q6HFqjNJ080377 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 17:52:51 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from westberg@xs4all.nl) Message-ID: <50058A4E.2080609@xs4all.nl> Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 17:52:46 +0200 From: Albert User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A016538@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be> <2A0EF872376D40A584E0EB27CC0AA272@White> <1342520058.86520.YahooMailNeo@web171604.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <500562FF.6090501@xs4all.nl> <003101cd6423$157f7540$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> In-Reply-To: <003101cd6423$157f7540$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Mal, About the Opera QSO mode, I called you (weeks ago on different occasions) at least 5 times after your CQ's but you probably have an Opera QSO RX problem. At one time Chris G3XIZ responded after I called you and we had a nice Opera QSO. I made also other Opera QSO's with PA stations. Its hard to get a real signal report, within a couple dB, in a real time cw QSO. With one Opera transmission I receive several real reports from all directions and I can repeat the transmission at different squences to see what propagation does to the signal strenght during the day. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [194.109.24.24 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: ad8e5dd63f7497fd9d71d15044db2e2b Subject: Re: LF: opera coding demistified Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060706000209070706020307" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:326426176:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60d750058a8a4157 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------060706000209070706020307 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mal, About the Opera QSO mode, I called you (weeks ago on different occasions) at least 5 times after your CQ's but you probably have an Opera QSO RX problem. At one time Chris G3XIZ responded after I called you and we had a nice Opera QSO. I made also other Opera QSO's with PA stations. Its hard to get a real signal report, within a couple dB, in a real time cw QSO. With one Opera transmission I receive several real reports from all directions and I can repeat the transmission at different squences to see what propagation does to the signal strenght during the day. 73, Albert Op 17-7-2012 15:50, mal hamilton schreef: > Albert > It can be reported like CW and QRSS beacons by posting via Blacksheep > with email attachments if required. > or even better REAL time reporting in QSO mode --- No need for PC or > database storage/reporting. > I receive Opera to check my RADIO but disconnect the internet modem > because I do not want the data base information > I also transmitted Opera QSO mode on 500 and got no replies although I > got reports from all around EU via direct emails, seems QSO mode is > not popular > g3kev > --------------060706000209070706020307 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mal,


About the Opera QSO mode, I called you (weeks ago on different occasions) at least 5 times after your CQ's but you probably have an Opera QSO RX problem. At one time Chris G3XIZ responded after I called you and we had a nice Opera QSO. I made also other Opera QSO's with PA stations.
Its hard to get a real signal report, within a couple dB, in a real time cw QSO. With one Opera transmission I receive several real reports from all directions and I can repeat the transmission at different squences to see what propagation does to the signal strenght during the day.

73, Albert            



Op 17-7-2012 15:50, mal hamilton schreef:
Albert
It can be reported like CW and QRSS beacons by posting via Blacksheep with email attachments if required.
or even better REAL time reporting in QSO mode --- No need for PC or database storage/reporting.
I receive Opera to check my RADIO but disconnect the internet modem because I do not want the data base information
I also transmitted Opera QSO mode on 500 and got no replies although I got reports from all around EU via direct emails,  seems QSO mode is not popular
 
g3kev
 



--------------060706000209070706020307--