Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2184 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2005 08:01:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore02.plus.net) (192.168.71.3) by ptb-mailstore03.plus.net with SMTP; 5 Apr 2005 08:01:27 -0000 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1DIj14-000NSy-OG for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 09:02:30 +0100 Received: from [192.168.67.4] (helo=ptb-mxcore04.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1DIj14-000NSm-5W for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 09:02:30 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore04.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v1.0) id 1DIj06-00081b-GA for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 09:01:30 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1DIizU-0000O1-Bc for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 09:00:52 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1DIizT-0000Ns-Uq for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 09:00:51 +0100 Received: from gambit.vianw.pt ([195.22.31.34]) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DIizS-000179-D1 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 09:00:51 +0100 Received: from slave_13.esoterica.pt ([80.172.153.68]) by gambit.vianw.pt (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j359k7lx027823 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 10:46:09 +0100 Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20050405075654.019dd3f0@pop.vianw.pt> X-Sender: nx4ywv@pop.vianw.pt X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 08:00:41 +0000 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: Brian Rogerson In-Reply-To: <149.42aa14d0.2f83028b@aol.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.83/804/Mon Apr 4 15:38:58 2005 on gambit.vianw.pt X-Virus-Status: Clean X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: 195.22.31.34 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of esoterica.pt X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=no,HTML_20_30=0.504,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: Eu beacon frequencies Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit My profuse apologies. 73, Brian CT1DRP

At 20:50 04/04/2005, you wrote:

Dear Group,

this evening our frequency allocation near 135.922 kHz did not work out too well: CT1DRP came very close to RA3YO, and G3AQC ran into both of them later. It looks like Europe has grown so wide that we can't all see one another ;-)

As I am sitting pretty much in the middle here, my screen grabber could be used to assist frequency selection. To save the data bandwidth of loading all three images, the Eu window can be accessed directly as http://members.aol.com/df6nm2/testEu.gif (typically about 140kB, every 20 minutes).

To avoid crowding around 921.5, it might also be helpful if we knew the ZL receive window limits beforehand. I have received an Argo120 from Bob ranging 920.7...922.32, and Mike used to watch 920.4 ... 922.02. My suggestion would be to settle on something like 921 to 922.6 as a common receive range for high-resolution work.

73 and best of luck to all
Markus, DF6NM