Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24160 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2003 10:04:49 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from unknown (HELO netmail02.services.quay.plus.net) (192.168.225.73) by mailstore with SMTP; 10 Jul 2003 10:04:49 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 5644 invoked by uid 10001); 10 Jul 2003 10:04:48 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by netmail02.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 10 Jul 2003 10:04:48 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 19aYGF-0001S6-P4 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Thu, 10 Jul 2003 11:02:47 +0100 Received: from [195.22.0.27] (helo=iceman.esoterica.pt) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 19aYGB-0001Rx-Io for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 10 Jul 2003 11:02:43 +0100 Received: from slave-5.esoterica.pt (sjm042.esoterica.pt [195.22.17.170]) by iceman.esoterica.pt (8.12.3/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h6A8oZAH026927 for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2003 09:51:08 +0100 Message-ID: <5.2.0.9.2.20030710092348.00b39100@pop.vianw.pt> X-Sender: NX4YWV@vianw.pt@pop.vianw.pt X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 10:02:17 +0100 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: "Brian Rogerson" In-reply-to: <69.3a39b809.2c3e65ff@aol.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: LF: VO1NA July 10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TOversion=2.55 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Dear Joe, Markus, Jim and all, I was surprised when Jim said that his best reception was on the morning of the 8th as my best reception was undoubtedly on the morning of the 9th. Virtually all the transmission was at "O" until 05:00utc. This morning I received only two full call signs. Out of interest I have plotted DCF and CFH for 8-9 and 9-10, unfortunately nothing for 7-8 as my logging computer crashed. I have included the graph with the Argos of the two full call signs which I think were received later than those received by Markus. Certainly there are deep nulls for the night of 9-10 whereas none for the night of 8-9. The Argos and graph are on http://homepage.esoterica.pt/~brian/VO1NA.htm Time on Argo utc+1, on graph is utc, sorry the axes are not annotated this but was thrown together in a hurry. 73, Brian CT1DRP At 07:47 10/07/2003, you wrote: >Joe, > >excellent: This night turned out much better, with two complete callsigns >received in Nuernberg ;-). QRN had decayed around 23:00 UT, and the first >faint trace appeared at 0:46. The screenshot below ranges from 1:30 to >3:00 and is 1Hz high. CFH had a fairly flat maximum in the same interval. > >73, and many thanks for the effort > >Markus >DF6NM in JN59NK