Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6454 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2003 12:45:14 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from netmail02.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.221) by mailstore with SMTP; 21 Apr 2003 12:45:14 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 6297 invoked by uid 10001); 21 Apr 2003 12:45:14 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by netmail02.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 21 Apr 2003 12:45:14 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 197aeQ-0000Fh-Rx for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2003 13:44:02 +0100 Received: from [195.22.0.29] (helo=jubilee.esoterica.pt) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 197aeL-0000FY-I5 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2003 13:43:57 +0100 Received: from slave-5.esoterica.pt (sjm066.esoterica.pt [195.22.17.194]) by jubilee.esoterica.pt (8.12.3/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h3LCSe88016570 for ; Mon, 21 Apr 2003 13:29:33 +0100 Message-ID: <5.2.0.9.2.20030421123711.01ea5d80@pop.vianw.pt> X-Sender: NX4YWV@vianw.pt@pop.vianw.pt X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 12:41:46 +0100 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: "Brian Rogerson" In-reply-to: <3EA3E1E1.7BCC31DB@snet.net> References: <002a01c307ee$56549320$0500a8c0@charter.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: LF: TA 21 April Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-22.9 required=5.0tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTESversion=2.53 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Jay Much better than I expected. This is what your advice on the Z3801A has done! And I am not regretting having bought one as you predicted! 73, Brian CT1DRP At 13:19 21/04/2003, you wrote: >Jay Rusgrove