Return-Path: Received: (qmail 55349 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2004 01:03:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore02.plus.net) (192.168.71.3) by ptb-mailstore02.plus.net with SMTP; 13 Jul 2004 01:03:07 -0000 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1BkBiG-0007OA-TI for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 02:04:05 +0100 Received: from [192.168.67.2] (helo=ptb-mxcore02.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1BkBiG-0007NW-MA for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 02:04:04 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1BkBhH-0005s2-Me for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 01:03:03 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1BkBgh-0004o0-68 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 02:02:27 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1BkBgg-0004nr-Qs for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 02:02:26 +0100 Received: from smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.4.60]) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BkBgZ-0006jd-4N for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 02:02:26 +0100 Received: from 66-44-55-204.s458.tnt1.lnhva.md.dialup.rcn.com ([66.44.55.204] helo=piii750.erols.com) by smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #7) id 1BkBgW-0002SB-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 21:02:16 -0400 Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.0.20040712210109.0465e110@pop3.norton.antivirus> X-Sender: esanders/pop.erols.com@pop3.norton.antivirus X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 21:08:05 -0400 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: Nan and Sandy Sanders In-Reply-To: <40F2CF45.30049.6CA6CC@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=no,HTML_30_40=0.809,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,RCVD_IN_NJABL=0.1,RCVD_IN_SORBS=0.1 Subject: Re: LF: Receivers Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Tentec RX-320 with AMRAD mod
CUBIC R3030 and R3090 a bit older than 5 years but a very good receiver down to at least 16KHz.
see http://www.amrad.org/projects/lf/rx/index.htm

Sandy

WB5MMB

At 05:49 PM 7/12/04 +0100, you wrote:

I am compiling a list of receivers and transceivers suitable
for 136kHz. I know most of the older radios already but
does anyone use a radio made in, say, the last five years
that they use sucessfully? If so, does it need an LF pre-
amp? Is the noise blanker any good on LF QRN and/or
Loran? Is a narrow filter fitted as standard?

Your help would be appreciated.

Thanks

Mike, G3XDV
==========