Return-Path: Received: (qmail 80677 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2004 09:27:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore01.plus.net) (192.168.71.1) by ptb-mailstore02.plus.net with SMTP; 6 Jul 2004 09:27:34 -0000 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1BhmEe-000DJO-CN for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Tue, 06 Jul 2004 10:27:32 +0100 Received: from [192.168.67.1] (helo=ptb-mxcore01.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1BhmEe-000DJC-A8 for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Tue, 06 Jul 2004 10:27:32 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1BhmEd-000ANm-NE for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Tue, 06 Jul 2004 09:27:31 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1BhmDg-0005Ok-2X for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 06 Jul 2004 10:26:32 +0100 Received: from [213.232.95.59] (helo=relay.salmark.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1BhmDf-0005Ob-Lj for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 06 Jul 2004 10:26:31 +0100 Received: from rusty.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be ([134.58.240.42]) by relay.salmark.net with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Bhsnm-0006sa-Re for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 06 Jul 2004 17:28:14 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rusty.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3FFC1D71DE; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 11:26:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from antonius.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (antonius.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.240.73]) by rusty.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 132E91D71E1; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 11:26:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dell-rik.fys.kuleuven.ac.be (pc-10-33-165-177.fys.kuleuven.ac.be [10.33.165.177]) by antonius.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id E56944C2C5; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 11:26:21 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20040706112208.02cb37b8@u0019445.kuleuven.be> X-Sender: u0019445@u0019445.kuleuven.be X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2004 11:33:19 +0200 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: Rik Strobbe Cc: mike.dennison@ntlworld.com In-Reply-To: <40EA74A3.26177.39693A@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: by KULeuven Antivirus Cluster X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=no, Subject: Re: LF: Forbidden word? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Hi Mike, Seems possible. These days all kind of spam and "harassment" filters seem to check your mail before it reaches its destination. Discussing some technical topics with a US colleague one of my mail didn't get through, at the end a phrase "you have to dig deeper into the literature" caused the problem. It turned out that a mail filter (at the mail server !) had problems with "dig deeper". In all my innocence I thought that only twisted minded people would make a sexual link to that, but these days even mail servers seem to have a dirty mind ... 73, Rik ON7YD PS : I wonder if this mail makes it through the reflector At 09:45 6/07/2004 +0100, you wrote: >I tried many times to send a recent message through the >reflector withiut success. I finally got through when I >changed one word - that is the one that looks a bit like >'unsubscrobe'. > >Is this a forbidden word in messages? > >Mike, G3XDV >===========