Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19680 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2003 23:16:47 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from warrior.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.227) by mailstore with SMTP; 7 Jul 2003 23:16:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 24564 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2003 23:16:49 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by warrior.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 7 Jul 2003 23:16:49 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 19ZfDM-00038j-4Z for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Tue, 08 Jul 2003 00:16:08 +0100 Received: from [147.197.200.9] (helo=hestia.herts.ac.uk) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 19ZfDH-00038a-RR for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 08 Jul 2003 00:16:03 +0100 Received: from gemini ([147.197.200.44] helo=gemini.herts.ac.uk) by hestia.herts.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 19ZU02-0006sV-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 07 Jul 2003 12:17:38 +0100 Received: from [147.197.232.252] (helo=rsch-15.herts.ac.uk) by gemini.herts.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 19ZU01-0004m6-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 07 Jul 2003 12:17:37 +0100 Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.0.20030707113252.025bf530@gemini.herts.ac.uk> X-Sender: mj9ar@gemini.herts.ac.uk X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2003 12:14:23 +0100 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: "James Moritz" In-reply-to: <000001c343db$8cb86760$5967fea9@p4o2b7> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MailScanner: No Virus detected Subject: Re: LF: Field strength calcs. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TOversion=2.55 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false At 17:26 06/07/2003 +0100, you wrote: >When making the signal strength measurements using a loop antenna should >this be resonated or aperiodic? > >I made measurements under both conditions but the results are puzzling - >even allowing for my peripatetic decimal point! Dear Ian, LF Group, The voltage induced in a loop is: V = 2.1x10^-8 (fNAE) where f = frequency (Hz) N = number of turns A = area (m^2) E = field strength (V/m) Always assuming that the antennas are far enough apart for the loop to be in the "far field" (>1 - 2km seems to be enough) From the circuit point of view, the loop behaves as a voltage source of the value given by the formula, in series with the inductance and resistance of the loop winding. If a high impedance load is connected to the loop terminals, the measured voltage will be more or less that given by the formula. If the load impedance is relatively low, the output voltage will be reduced by the potential divider action of the loop inductance/resistance and the load resistance. For single-turn loops less than a few metres in diameter, the inductive reactance is only a few ohms, so even a 50ohm load on the loop will have little effect on the signal voltage - this is one reason single-turn loops are popular for measurements; few variables affect the measurement. A multi-turn loop with higher inductance can be series-tuned; the reactance of the loop is cancelled by the capacitor reactance, eliminating this loading effect. A parallel-tuned loop could be used with a high impedance load - in this case, the voltage will be stepped up by a factor equal to the loaded Q of the loop - but since this depends on a number of variables, it introduces greater uncertainty into the measurements. If you turn the formula round, you get E by measuring the signal voltage: E = V/(2.1x10^-8 x fNA) Then ERP (relative to a dipole) is: Perp = (Ed)^2 /50 (d is distance in metres, E is fs in V/m, Perp in watts) Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU