Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23540 invoked from network); 9 May 2003 16:31:09 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from murphys.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.225) by mailstore with SMTP; 9 May 2003 16:31:09 -0000 X-Priority: 3 Received: (qmail 20650 invoked from network); 9 May 2003 16:30:52 -0000 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by murphys.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 9 May 2003 16:30:52 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 19EAhj-00034s-8d for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Fri, 09 May 2003 17:26:39 +0100 Received: from [147.197.200.9] (helo=hestia.herts.ac.uk) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 19EAhc-00034j-Hm for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 09 May 2003 17:26:32 +0100 Received: from gemini ([147.197.200.44] helo=gemini.herts.ac.uk) by hestia.herts.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 19EAhV-0000ZG-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 09 May 2003 17:26:25 +0100 Received: from [147.197.232.252] (helo=rsch-15.herts.ac.uk) by gemini.herts.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 19EAhT-0001wZ-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 09 May 2003 17:26:23 +0100 Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.0.20030509160755.00b1f438@gemini.herts.ac.uk> X-Sender: mj9ar@gemini.herts.ac.uk X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 17:26:19 +0100 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: "James Moritz" In-reply-to: <011901c31622$24a8d790$0100a8c0@athlon> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MailScanner: No Virus detected Subject: Re: LF: Other transmission lines Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.9 required=5.0tests=IN_REP_TO,REFERENCESversion=2.53 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Dear LF Group, Getting back to the topic of LF antennas, another useful type of feed method for LF antennas is the "450ohm unbalanced air line", or, to the layman, the "bit of wire hanging in the air". The idea is to have a loading coil at the feed point of the antenna as normal, but with about 90 - 95% of the inductance required to achieve resonance. This is then connected back to the shack by a single wire, where the other 5 - 10% of the inductance is located, which is made variable so that tuning can be performed in the shack. The feeder can be 10-20m or more, and a couple of metres or so off the ground without having much effect on antenna behaviour. The impedance that the feeder is operating at is some hundreds of ohms, comparable with the Zo of the wire feeder, so loss in the feeder is minimal - analogous to feeding an HF doublet antenna with open-wire balanced line. Another way of viewing it is as the same as having an elevated loading coil, but with the loading coil displaced horizontally instead of vertically. The advantage is that the single-wire transmission line only carries a few hundred volts, so normal HF wire antenna type insulation where the feeder comes into the shack is adequate. This allows you to locate the loading coil in the best possible position, and greatly reduces the insulation problems, losses, noise pick-up and fire hazard compared with having the loading coil inside the shack, while keeping the convenience of being able to tune the antenna from the operating position without needing a remote control. Since the feed point is located close to the transmitter, impedance matching to the TX output can be done in any way you choose without worrying about matching to an intermediate transmission line. I used this method successfully for some time witth my first LF antenna a few years ago. Also, we used this arrangement for the TX antenna on the Porthcurno expedition recently, with good results. Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU