Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25659 invoked from network); 27 Mar 2003 12:54:52 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from netmail02.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.221) by mailstore with SMTP; 27 Mar 2003 12:54:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 13026 invoked by uid 10001); 27 Mar 2003 12:54:52 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by netmail02.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 27 Mar 2003 12:54:51 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 18yWnj-0005OT-VA for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 12:48:11 +0000 Received: from [134.58.240.45] (helo=thumbler.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 18yWnc-0005OG-6N for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 12:48:04 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thumbler.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4ECF137798 for ; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 13:47:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from octavianus.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (octavianus.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.240.71]) by thumbler.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 632A81377A4 for ; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 13:47:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from dell-rik.fys.kuleuven.ac.be (pc-10-33-165-177.fys.kuleuven.ac.be [10.33.165.177]) by octavianus.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47077AEA47 for ; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 13:47:33 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.0.20030327134321.02d8fdd8@u0019445.kuleuven.be> X-Sender: u0019445@u0019445.kuleuven.be X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 13:48:21 +0100 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: "Rik Strobbe" In-reply-to: <003801c2f2f3$e0614140$1b00a8c0@dellboy> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: by KULeuven Antivirus Cluster Subject: Re: LF: Comparison of QRSS speed performance. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.8 required=5.0tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TOversion=2.51 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.51 (1.174.2.5-2003-03-20-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hello Dave and Alan, Really impressing how little power is needed to travel 220km at 136kHz. The 360mW needed for the CW copy should be no more than about 1mW ERP I guess, QRSS60 does the job with no more than 2uW ERP. 73, Rik ON7YD At 17:27 25/03/2003 +0000, you wrote: >Dear all. > >I did some tests today with Alan G3NYK at about 220km distance, to compare >the performance of different QRSS speeds under real band conditions. How >much better is QRSS60 than QRSS10 or QRSS3... or CW? >Find out our findings at http://www.wireless.org.uk/signoise.htm > >73 >Dave G3YXM.