Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6206 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2002 13:26:15 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from murphys.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.225) by mailstore with SMTP; 16 Jul 2002 13:26:15 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 12487 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2002 13:25:29 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by murphys.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 16 Jul 2002 13:25:29 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 17USEK-0001bI-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Tue, 16 Jul 2002 14:19:04 +0100 Received: from mail2.cc.kuleuven.ac.be ([134.58.10.50]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 17USEJ-0001bD-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 16 Jul 2002 14:19:03 +0100 Received: from dell-rik.fys.kuleuven.ac.be ([10.33.165.177]) by mail2.cc.kuleuven.ac.be (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id g6GDIW2H153170 for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2002 15:18:32 +0200 Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.0.20020716150706.00b88cf8@pb623250.kuleuven.be> X-Sender: pb623250@pb623250.kuleuven.be X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 15:21:56 +0200 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: "Rik Strobbe" Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re:_LF:_Re:_Activity_from_DLF=C2=B4s_360m_mast?= In-reply-to: <001c01c22cc4$0d1b4ba0$0100000a@roy> References: <003001c22c3d$9fbd3680$5f74ccd4@DEFAULT> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: I don't think it is a matter of impressing someone but just of taking a chance to experiment, and isn't this what LF is all about ? Nobody is obliged to participate and the activity is very restricted in time, so apart from one or two "wounded ego's" no harm will be done. Good luck to Walter and his gang ... 73, Rik ON7YD PS : Keeping in mind the RX problems at "big antenna" sites that occured in the past it might be useful to have a RX site at some distance (1..2 km) At 13:26 16/07/2002 +0100, you wrote: >Hello LF'ers, >And you will still not be ( Or ever will be ) as potentialy efficient as >MM0ALM Dave Nr Stonehaven ever was! If you have to use the aid of Commercial >Masts, Tower Blocks, Computer DATA, Remote Links and Repeater Networks or >Gateways... THEN WHY BOTHER AT ALL? It's one big farse and you lot are not >impressing anybody one iota. > >Regards & Best Wishes >Roy >GM0PYC