Return-Path: <majordom@post.thorcom.com> Received: (qmail 24249 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2002 14:50:59 -0000 Received: from murphys.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.225) by mailstore with SMTP; 30 Jun 2002 14:50:59 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 23655 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2002 14:50:34 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by murphys.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 30 Jun 2002 14:50:34 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 17Oft5-0005rs-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sun, 30 Jun 2002 15:41:15 +0100 Received: from cmailenv4.svr.pol.co.uk ([213.218.77.56]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 17Oft4-0005rn-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 30 Jun 2002 15:41:14 +0100 Received: from [62.21.149.10] (helo=w8k3f0.freeler.nl) by cmailENV4.svr.pol.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 17Oft0-0008BM-00; Sun, 30 Jun 2002 14:41:10 +0000 Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.0.20020630153034.00a58e60@POP3.freeler.nl> X-Sender: FRE0000086604@POP3.freeler.nl X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 16:40:51 +0200 To: "LF-Group" <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org> From: "Dick Rollema" <d.w.rollema@freeler.nl> Subject: LF: SAQ Cc: "Cas Caspers" <cas.caspers@hetnet.nl>, "Jaap Kroon, PA0IF" <jaapkroon@wxs.nl>, "Jan Harte" <jan.harte@hetnet.nl>, "Jan Hekkert, PA3HCD" <jhekkert@ichthus.lifenet.nl>, "Koos Fockens, PA0KDF" <K.Fockens@iaf.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: <majordom@post.thorcom.com> Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit <html> <font size=3><b>To All from PA0SE<br><br> Today I had good reception of SAQ on 17.2kHz. I used a Wandel & Goltermann SLM type SPM-12 connected to the aerial system for 136kHz with 26nF extra in parallel with the loading coil.<br><br> Replacing the aerial by a one-turn untuned square loop of 1 x 1 m the signal was sufficiently over the noise to be measured at 0.174 microvolt (25Hz I.F. bandwidth).<br><br> From this follows a field strength of about 482 microvolt/metre (53.7dBľV).<br><br> This makes it possible to do some speculation as to the power radiated by SAQ (Effective Monopole Radiated Power, EMRP). <br><br> The coordinates of SAQ are given as 57.07N, 12.24E. Using a computer program written by Harry, PA0LQ, I find as QTH locator JO67CB. My own locator is JO22GD. Again using Harry's program yields a distance of 735km.<br><br> We can now enter these data into the graphs of CCIR Recommendation 368-7 for ground-wave propagation. This results in:<br><br> <u>Type of ground</u> <u>dielectric constant </u> <u>conductivity (mS/m)</u> <u>EMRP<br><br> </u>Perfect ground - - 1.4kW<br><br> Land 40 30 3.0kW<br><br> Land 22 3 3.7kW<br><br> Medium dry 15 1 4.7kW<br> ground<br><br> Dry ground 7 0.3 5.9kW<br> ground<br><br> If we estimate from these data an EMRP of 4kW then with an alternator output of 200kW the efficiency of the aerial system is (4/200) * 100% = 2%.<br><br> For an aerial at such a low frequency that seems not too bad.<br><br> It could well be that the aerial system was designed to give some directivity towards the USA.<br> In that case the power must be higher than assumed. <br><br> Well, take it for what it is worth!<br><br> It would be nice if someone nearer to Grimeton would measure the field strength outside the near field area, for instance at 5 wavelength distance, or 87km. <br> At that distance at 17.2km perfect ground can be assumed for calculating the EMRP (1kw produces 300mV/m at 1km distance, decreasing in a linear way with distance). <br><br> I also managed to work SA6Q in the 136kHz band. Sent RST459, received RST429.<br><br> I have made a WAV recording of SAQ of 1 minute duration and have sent it to SAQ. It is much too to pass the reflector.<br><br> 73, Dick, PA0SE </font></b></html>