Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22674 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2002 13:42:29 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by excalibur-qfe1-smtp-plusnet.harl.plus.net with SMTP; 26 Jan 2002 13:42:29 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 18646 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2002 13:42:28 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 26 Jan 2002 13:42:28 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16UT3M-0002cw-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sat, 26 Jan 2002 13:39:32 +0000 Received: from tomts17.bellnexxia.net ([209.226.175.71] helo=tomts17-srv.bellnexxia.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16UT3L-0002cr-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 26 Jan 2002 13:39:31 +0000 Received: from server1.sympatico.ca ([209.226.189.183]) by tomts17-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.4.01.03.16 201-229-121-116-20010115) with ESMTP id <20020126133840.QEDN16289.tomts17-srv.bellnexxia.net@server1.sympatico.ca> for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2002 08:38:40 -0500 Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.0.20020126083533.00b18d00@POP2.sympatico.ca> X-Sender: b1aemm59@POP2.sympatico.ca X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2002 08:38:38 -0500 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: "Larry Kayser" Subject: Re: LF: G0MRF/SM6LKM DDS VFO and Jason In-reply-to: <155.7e45e92.2983fa8f@aol.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: >>David et all: >>The latest QST has >>another DDS design with 1 Hz steps that are not quite 1 Hz really, rather >>sad to see the impact of thinking that can only cope with 1 Hz increments >>hi. and >I checked with the author of the QST article, as it wasn't clear what the >DDS could do. I received a reply that said you need a diferent code for >the MPU for each band you wish to cover. >Not a very versatile product. I have often wondered what many of the QST articles are that look like that article. I suspect that many of them are Masters Engineering program projects. So often I see this type of article and I have a feeling that the author is not really current in what is going on of just doesn't care. Just my opinion of course. Larry VA3LK