Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13198 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2002 16:02:16 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 23 Jan 2002 16:02:16 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 9398 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2002 16:02:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 23 Jan 2002 16:02:16 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16TPoD-0001gX-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 15:59:33 +0000 Received: from hestia.herts.ac.uk ([147.197.200.9]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16TPoC-0001gS-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 15:59:32 +0000 Received: from gemini ([147.197.200.44] helo=gemini.herts.ac.uk) by hestia.herts.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 16TPnN-0001hm-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 15:58:41 +0000 Received: from [147.197.232.252] (helo=rsch-15.herts.ac.uk) by gemini.herts.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 16TPnN-0002N5-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 15:58:41 +0000 Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.0.20020123154726.00a97de8@gemini.herts.ac.uk> X-Sender: mj9ar@gemini.herts.ac.uk X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 15:57:55 +0000 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: "James Moritz" Subject: Re: LF: Jason Tests In-reply-to: <3.0.5.32.20020123135050.009a9dc0@pop3.esoterica.pt> References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020123122418.00b0bc60@gemini.herts.ac.uk> <3.0.1.16.20020123094440.2d17c80e@pb623250.kuleuven.be> <3C4DB13D.B1B47595@netscapeonline.co.uk> <5.1.0.14.0.20020122153052.00aa9420@gemini.herts.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: At 13:50 23/01/2002 +0000, you wrote: >Dear Jim, > > >I can run the beacon again tonight in anyone is interested - is 135.910kHz > >a good frequency, or is there a better one? > >May I look at it the other way? 137.5xxx is an absolute mass of lines here. > >73, Brian >73 Brian CT1DRP IN51QD 41 09 58N 08 39 11W >http://homepage.esoterica.pt/~brian Dear Brian, So if I transmit a beacon signal on 135.91 at around 2000utc this evening, would that be OK? Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU