Return-Path: <majordom@post.thorcom.com> Received: (qmail 520 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2001 18:09:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 4 Mar 2001 18:09:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 763 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2001 18:08:49 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys with SMTP; 4 Mar 2001 18:08:49 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #2) id 14Zcq0-0003Du-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sun, 04 Mar 2001 18:02:32 +0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from public2.thorcom.com ([212.172.148.20] ident=root) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 14Zcpz-0003Dp-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 04 Mar 2001 18:02:31 +0000 Received: from fm215.facility.pipex.com ([194.131.104.225]) by public2.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 14Zblo-0003hQ-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 04 Mar 2001 16:54:08 +0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from 233.pncl.co.uk (135.235.35.212.in-addr.arpa.ip-pool.cix.co.uk [212.35.235.135]) by fm215.facility.pipex.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA24156 for <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>; Sun, 4 Mar 2001 17:49:52 GMT Message-ID: <5.0.2.1.2.20010304175030.00a84070@mail.pncl.co.uk> X-Sender: blanch@mail.pncl.co.uk X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2001 17:52:10 +0000 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: "Walter Blanchard" <blanch@pncl.co.uk> Subject: Re: LF: corrections In-reply-to: <3AA1455E.224CEB80@netscapeonline.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: <majordom@post.thorcom.com> At 19:26 03/03/01 Saturday, G3KEV wrote: >There seems to be so many mistakes in the latest COMIC. Who did the >proof reading before publication? Can I get a hardback of the >corrections? There is no excuse for this amateurish edition. >I bought the original version and could not see the CARTOONS, they were >BLACKED out. >I still have it as proof if anyone would like to try and identify what >noddy is trying to illustrate. >The cover was scuffed when I got it, the internal pages were photo >copied. Did I get a second hand copy? During my time at College this >sort of presentation would have been a FAILURE. I suppose today with >only 30% required for a degree pass at University this is accepatable >to some!!!!!! Why not try writing one yourself then? You seem to know it all. Walter G3JKV.