X-GM-THRID: 1220197751203548788 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf X-Gmail-Received: efdb1620bc058a4d1c74940ffafb963ef250db08 Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.70.124.5 with SMTP id w5cs146804wxc; Thu, 16 Nov 2006 02:12:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.57.11 with SMTP id f11mr354305hua.1163671975791; Thu, 16 Nov 2006 02:12:55 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c18si1729776hub.2006.11.16.02.12.53; Thu, 16 Nov 2006 02:12:55 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Gke8w-0006lX-V4 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 16 Nov 2006 10:06:50 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.35] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Gke8w-0006lO-Ib for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 16 Nov 2006 10:06:50 +0000 Received: from imo-m28.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.9]) by relay3.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Gke8t-0002WQ-ST for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 16 Nov 2006 10:06:50 +0000 Received: from GandalfG8@aol.com by imo-m28.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r7.6.) id l.4bd.8500742 (39330) for ; Thu, 16 Nov 2006 05:06:35 -0500 (EST) From: GandalfG8@aol.com Message-ID: <4bd.8500742.328d922b@aol.com> Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 05:06:35 EST To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: 9.0 SE for Windows sub 5017 X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,NO_REAL_NAME=0.55 Subject: Re: LF: Very Annoying Aricle Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1163671595" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_FONTCOLOR_BLUE, HTML_MESSAGE,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3562 -------------------------------1163671595 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 16/11/2006 09:54:42 GMT Standard Time, ACTALBOT@mail.dstl.gov.uk writes: More HF than LF, but I became very annoyed after reading it. Do these people not understand basic engineering? _http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/6129460.stm_ (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/6129460.stm) Woweeeeeeeee Now isn't that just amazing, or would "crazy" be a better word? I'm rather more gobsmacked than annoyed, but obviously the answer to your question is a resounding "NO" "Tails of energy" do sound rather appealing though, and think how much more efficient radio transmission would be too if the transmitter just reabsorbed all the energy that wasn't actually taken up by receivers. Perhaps someone should recommend that to the BBC, and hint at a license fee reduction:-) regards Nigel GM8PZR -------------------------------1163671595 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

In a message dated 16/11/2006 09:54:42 GMT Standard Time,=20 ACTALBOT@mail.dstl.gov.uk writes:

<= FONT=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size= =3D2>

More HF than LF, but I became very annoyed=20= after=20 reading it.
Do these pe= ople not=20 understand basic engineering?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/6129460.stm=20

Woweeeeeeeee

Now isn't that just amazing, or would "crazy" be a better=20 word?

I'm rather more gobsmacked than annoyed, but obviously the answer=20= to=20 your question is a resounding "NO"

"Tails of energy" do sound rather appealing though, and think how=20= much=20 more efficient radio transmission would be too if the transmitter just=20 reabsorbed all the energy that wasn't actually taken up by receivers.

Perhaps someone should recommend that to the BBC, and hint at a license= fee=20 reduction:-)

regards

Nigel

GM8PZR

-------------------------------1163671595--