Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dk01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 5AAD238000094; Sat, 7 Jul 2012 20:49:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SnfgH-0002go-6N for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 08 Jul 2012 01:48:57 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SnfgG-0002gf-El for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 08 Jul 2012 01:48:56 +0100 Received: from mail-wg0-f47.google.com ([74.125.82.47]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SnfgE-0001kb-VJ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 08 Jul 2012 01:48:55 +0100 Received: by wgbfa7 with SMTP id fa7so7770437wgb.28 for ; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 17:48:54 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ffp8BDcUrjfJ16NCG2CKcnGziTu23ieJZd/yNIm35Ds=; b=gPrW4AEik6QqOo7SZtcSfX/eB48FoQQtXbyWs+TmtPKOTWdgEwqRO1uzek9hsGKm73 Go5tNQmSDFBtO+6Hg+5xKYcTepEuavkRvXxYuWxWW44rGYQ9LtA4+RkKl0iVSSahySCf qMPZY7ATKGLF2rhojbMs1JiLUcxhKCLq+GH4503/3XgyHjhh1S1zPcJV+cK+ovOslcws OYbLyxtujKVx3zR7ss8zxR1h5QE+Jcz45UWnX53P1ynPC2LMhBDEyLGZnhbQ0TYun/An IIgQA5tHjKChijqWhkGSxUhrI0qz5rTGoKgUVKwqtwT3YYSlBX4/pI+sYHk6fnY7dN4I VvYw== Received: by 10.180.109.195 with SMTP id hu3mr18594496wib.8.1341708533911; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 17:48:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.21.4] ([87.114.176.125]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id df4sm14753534wib.4.2012.07.07.17.48.51 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 07 Jul 2012 17:48:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FF8D8F2.9030904@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2012 00:48:50 +0000 From: John P-G User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120312 Thunderbird/11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4FF8A6FC.3080908@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <77609A3EEB884D3BAA099FABA96A86FC@AGB> In-Reply-To: <77609A3EEB884D3BAA099FABA96A86FC@AGB> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On 07/07/2012 23:56, Graham wrote: > Roger, > > -25 , In there lies the problem , 0036 -2 2.5 0.478487 0 SM6BHZ JO57 27 0036 -6 -1.0 0.478531 0 DF6NM JN59 27 That looks healthier, and up to CW QSO strength? [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [74.125.82.47 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (gm4slv[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: f62c7cf8eeb8e5a327b71719e9bffff1 Subject: Re: LF: Saturday night... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=LINES_OF_YELLING, LINES_OF_YELLING_2 autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:437466944:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m287.2 ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1db4054ff8d936123f X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none On 07/07/2012 23:56, Graham wrote: > Roger, > > -25 , In there lies the problem , 0036 -2 2.5 0.478487 0 SM6BHZ JO57 27 0036 -6 -1.0 0.478531 0 DF6NM JN59 27 That looks healthier, and up to CW QSO strength? Gus was actually stronger earlier in the day: 0958 2 1.3 0.478487 0 SM6BHZ JO57 27 1002 1 1.4 0.478487 0 SM6BHZ JO57 27 1006 1 1.4 0.478487 0 SM6BHZ JO57 27 1010 0 1.4 0.478487 0 SM6BHZ JO57 27 1014 0 1.4 0.478487 0 SM6BHZ JO57 27 1018 1 1.5 0.478487 0 SM6BHZ JO57 27 1022 1 1.5 0.478487 0 SM6BHZ JO57 27 At 815km, to be +1dB in daylight isn't too shabby, I think? John GM4SLV