Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25])
by mtain-mc01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 54F62380000BA;
Sat, 16 Jun 2012 16:24:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
id 1SfzWq-0000i8-85
for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 21:23:28 +0100
Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
id 1SfzWp-0000hz-RT
for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 21:23:27 +0100
Received: from cpsmtpb-ews06.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.39.9])
by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77)
(envelope-from <pa3abk@kpnmail.nl>)
id 1SfzWn-0003iT-J7
for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 21:23:26 +0100
Received: from cpsps-ews19.kpnxchange.com ([10.94.84.185]) by cpsmtpb-ews06.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675);
Sat, 16 Jun 2012 22:23:25 +0200
Received: from CPSMTPM-CMT104.kpnxchange.com ([195.121.3.20]) by cpsps-ews19.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.17514);
Sat, 16 Jun 2012 22:23:24 +0200
Received: from [192.168.2.13] ([62.131.23.134]) by CPSMTPM-CMT104.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.0.6002.18264);
Sat, 16 Jun 2012 22:23:24 +0200
Message-ID: <4FDCEB38.9090807@kpnmail.nl>
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 22:23:20 +0200
From: pa3abk <pa3abk@kpnmail.nl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <E65F69DD3D804302B0DB57F377030EBF@AGB> <4FDCE611.7070004@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
In-Reply-To: <4FDCE611.7070004@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Jun 2012 20:23:24.0810 (UTC) FILETIME=[E1A4DEA0:01CD4BFD]
X-RcptDomain: blacksheep.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: Stefan, I can hear you, marginal... In QSO some other DL station
(?) But maybe it's better to listen on 501kHz, possible the filter is less
attenuated there. Have my doubts, because you are very deep in the noise
(and static) [...]
Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no
trust
[213.75.39.9 listed in list.dnswl.org]
X-Scan-Signature: 64437c466041e93ffedda7fb96b22b71
Subject: Re: LF: CW on 477.5 kHz
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
x-aol-global-disposition: G
X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:447404672:93952408
X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0
x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60494fdceb685962
X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25
X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none
Stefan,
I can hear you, marginal...
In QSO some other DL station (?)
But maybe it's better to listen on 501kHz, possible the filter is less
attenuated there.
Have my doubts, because you are very deep in the noise (and static)
FYI I have H24 solid CW QSO with g3xiz mostly S-7/8 about same distance
both using about 100W.
Jan/pa3abk
NNNN
On 16-6-2012 22:01, Stefan Schäfer wrote:
> MF,
>
> Now my RX and active antenna is much better after adding a band filter
> in front of the first gate. Most probably there was an overload of the
> input before. Now DLF is 40 dB attenuated and the RX performs much
> better. I can hear the crashes / sferics and see several traces, still
> not sure if they are local QRM or a far field signal.
>
> My TX is ready as well. I will *call CQ on 477.5 kHz in CW and look
> for skeds*! I can receive on 505 kHz (arround) as well but my filters
> in the RX already attenuate the region by about 20 dB... Anyway worth
> a try.
>
> Starting now!
>
> 73, Stefan/DK7FC
--
pa3abk<-> dordrecht jo21it