Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dd05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 16508380000B9; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 04:07:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SbSJh-00016q-FU for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 09:07:09 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SbSJg-00016G-LO for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 09:07:08 +0100 Received: from defout.telus.net ([204.209.205.31]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SbSJe-0005Ns-ME for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 09:07:07 +0100 Received: from edmwcm04 ([204.209.205.31]) by priv-edmwes48.telusplanet.net (InterMail vM.8.01.03.00 201-2260-125-20100507) with ESMTP id <20120604080658.UGAU11384.priv-edmwes48.telusplanet.net@edmwcm04> for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 02:06:58 -0600 Received: from [192.168.0.100] ([50.92.21.11]) by edmwcm04 with bizsmtp id J7xC1j0300ELsZu017xDij; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 01:57:13 -0600 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=xe1kXdDUpMZg26Ozmtu6NDPbLQj4YktJcmTKvqO5QKc= c=1 sm=2 a=1ecT6ltovS0A:10 a=IwcDF9FXKQ4A:10 a=LGgl8L9ij00A:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=6dsG4QSZBpoLiYGBhcAA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 X-Telus-Outbound-IP: 50.92.21.11 Message-ID: <4FCC6CA2.2060702@telus.net> Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 01:06:58 -0700 From: John Gibbs User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org, rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: I'm with Clive on this idea.... Blacksheep as it generally is now for QSO and signal reports and Yahoo for technical discussion. That way daily QSO information will not be archived and design/construction projects can make full use of the search function and files section of Yahoo. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [204.209.205.31 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Scan-Signature: 925300287489a1d7272e62b121c112aa Subject: Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:359078880:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40914fcc6cd50a31 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none I'm with Clive on this idea.... Blacksheep as it generally is now for QSO and signal reports and Yahoo for technical discussion. That way daily QSO information will not be archived and design/construction projects can make full use of the search function and files section of Yahoo. Regards, John / VE7BDQ