Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mp06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 1103938000087; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 03:52:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SbS4c-0000hO-Ch for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 08:51:34 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SbS4b-0000hF-VT for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 08:51:33 +0100 Received: from out1.ip07ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.243]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SbS4a-0005GE-9R for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 08:51:32 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoBAK5nzE9OlnGb/2dsb2JhbAANOLU6AQGCBwEBAQEDMgEFEUALCQgDAQEBAQklDwI+CBMGAgEBviuLEYJ6gxYDlRuJIIk3 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,711,1330905600"; d="scan'208";a="37041582" Received: from host-78-150-113-155.as13285.net (HELO [192.168.2.7]) ([78.150.113.155]) by out1.ip07ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 04 Jun 2012 08:51:28 +0100 Message-ID: <4FCC6900.70001@psk31.plus.com> Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 08:51:28 +0100 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4FCB96A9.4010009@usa.net> <4FCB9F34.7040604@legal-medicine.de> <4FCBCC8B.9050308@usa.net> <77A08BCA-E9AB-404B-B425-BFD3564F66FE@thelortons.co.uk> <535C7AB088034F3CAF4C51D1FF382816@AGB> In-Reply-To: <535C7AB088034F3CAF4C51D1FF382816@AGB> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Yes its a good compromise and I never feel pain or distress when receiving mails from two sources personally. Eddie On 04/06/2012 08:40, Graham wrote: > Yes 'Flash' traffic only on the ref > > G. > > > From: "Clive Lorton" > Sent: Monday, June 04, 2012 8:04 AM > To: ; > Subject: Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep > >> Gentlemen, >> >> IÂ’m beginning to think there has to be a place for both groups. >> Blacksheep as it generally is now for QSO and signal reports and >> Yahoo for technical discussion. That way daily QSO information will >> not be archived and design/construction projects can make full use of >> the search function and files section of Yahoo. >> >> Just my two pence worthÂ…Â….. >> >> Clive g8poc > > > > > ----- > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 2012.0.2178 / Virus Database: 2425/5043 - Release Date: 06/03/12 > > [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [62.24.128.243 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Scan-Signature: 64437c466041e93ffedda7fb96b22b71 Subject: Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1dc14a4fcc69395d82 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Yes its a good compromise and I never feel pain or distress when receiving mails from two sources personally. Eddie On 04/06/2012 08:40, Graham wrote: > Yes 'Flash' traffic only on the ref > > G. > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "Clive Lorton" > Sent: Monday, June 04, 2012 8:04 AM > To: ; > Subject: Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep > >> Gentlemen, >> >> I’m beginning to think there has to be a place for both groups. >> Blacksheep as it generally is now for QSO and signal reports and >> Yahoo for technical discussion. That way daily QSO information will >> not be archived and design/construction projects can make full use of >> the search function and files section of Yahoo. >> >> Just my two pence worth…….. >> >> Clive g8poc > > > > > ----- > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 2012.0.2178 / Virus Database: 2425/5043 - Release Date: 06/03/12 > >