Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-db02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 0BB003800009C; Sun, 3 Jun 2012 13:09:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SbEI1-0003BE-7q for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 18:08:29 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SbEI0-0003B5-R7 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 18:08:28 +0100 Received: from cmsout01.mbox.net ([165.212.64.31]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SbEHz-0002lH-3L for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 18:08:27 +0100 Received: from cmsout01.mbox.net (cmsout01-lo [127.0.0.1]) by cmsout01.mbox.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D9852AC7A0 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2012 17:08:25 +0000 (GMT) X-USANET-Received: from cmsout01.mbox.net [127.0.0.1] by cmsout01.mbox.net via mtad (C8.MAIN.3.82F) with ESMTP id 105qFcRiw9120M01; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 17:08:22 -0000 X-USANET-Routed: 3 gwsout-vs Q:bmvirus Received: from imap03.cms.usa.net [165.212.11.3] by cmsout01.mbox.net via smtad (C8.MAIN.3.72B) with ESMTP id XID138qFcRiw7358X01; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 17:08:22 -0000 X-USANET-Source: 165.212.11.3 IN dibene@usa.net imap03.cms.usa.net X-USANET-MsgId: XID138qFcRiw7358X01 Received: from [127.0.0.1] [151.55.22.185] by imap03.cms.usa.net (ESMTPSA/dibene@usa.net) via mtad (C8.MAIN.3.82G) with ESMTPSA id 579qFcRiV6816M23; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 17:08:22 -0000 X-USANET-Auth: 151.55.22.185 AUTH dibene@usa.net [127.0.0.1] Message-ID: <4FCB9A03.8080802@usa.net> Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2012 19:08:19 +0200 From: Alberto di Bene User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4FCB225B.7020209@legal-medicine.de><000b01cd416c$9bef0a20$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <00d501cd4198$727929b0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <4FCB93EC.3030907@psk31.plus.com> <270B05A58E9F46F4AD21EFF298F32DE6@Shack> In-Reply-To: <270B05A58E9F46F4AD21EFF298F32DE6@Shack> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 120603-0, 06/03/2012), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Z-USANET-MsgId: XID579qFcRiw6816X23 X-Spam-Score: 1.1 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On 6/3/2012 6:56 PM, Tony wrote: Difficult members can be banned in exceptional circumstances. [...] Content analysis details: (1.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [165.212.64.31 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 1.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts X-Scan-Signature: 0a4643e586472c13187d293ec5d096c2 Subject: LF: Re: O.T.: Reflector status Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE, MIME_HTML_ONLY autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:420035904:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40564fcb9a3e2962 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none On 6/3/2012 6:56 PM, Tony wrote:
<snip>
Difficult members can be banned in exceptional circumstances.
<snip>
=A0
Can't the same be done also by the Blacksheep moderator (or administrator, if this term is more acceptable) ?
Censorship (or the lack of thereof) does not depend on the technical substrate, but just on the person who
has the authority to perform it.

73=A0 Alberto=A0 I2PHD