Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dd02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id ABB783800009D; Sun, 3 Jun 2012 08:42:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SbA7X-00072X-4u for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 13:41:23 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SbA7W-00072O-Oj for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 13:41:22 +0100 Received: from mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.49]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SbA7V-0001DZ-8h for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 13:41:21 +0100 Received: from aamtaout04-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vM.7.08.04.00 201-2186-134-20080326) with ESMTP id <20120603124120.GADW4604.mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamtaout04-winn.ispmail.ntl.com> for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2012 13:41:20 +0100 Received: from [192.168.2.2] (really [82.5.252.56]) by aamtaout04-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vG.3.00.04.00 201-2196-133-20080908) with ESMTP id <20120603124120.QYHW23925.aamtaout04-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@[192.168.2.2]> for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2012 13:41:20 +0100 From: "Mike Dennison" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2012 13:41:13 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <4FCB6979.16782.CAC7BE@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.41) Content-description: Mail message body X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=JvdXmxIgLJv2/GthKqHpGJEEHukvLcvELVXUanXFreg= c=1 sm=0 a=uObrxnre4hsA:10 a=9YlaCzn6_68A:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=U0ykz8pLPa3IpxLRZggA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: I am puzzled by those few who are against the change-over to Yahoo. Once you have joined and set your option to "e-mail only", you never need to visit the Yahoo site again and the emails from Yahoo are virtually the same as those from this reflector. How does the change affect the user? [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [81.103.221.49 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Scan-Signature: e4383209d2ccb9552700d53c0b540538 Subject: LF: Yahoo vs Blacksheep Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:255888704:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d408e4fcb5ba42ca3 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none I am puzzled by those few who are against the change-over to Yahoo. Once you have joined and set your option to "e-mail only", you never need to visit the Yahoo site again and the emails from Yahoo are virtually the same as those from this reflector. How does the change affect the user? Mike, G3XDV ==========