Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dc06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 6D50C38000085; Sat, 2 Jun 2012 03:44:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SaizI-0005gi-PE for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 08:43:04 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SaizI-0005gZ-0s for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 08:43:04 +0100 Received: from mout6.freenet.de ([195.4.92.96]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (UNKNOWN:AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SaizG-0004ZP-Cn for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 08:43:02 +0100 Received: from [195.4.92.140] (helo=mjail0.freenet.de) by mout6.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1SaizF-0005lX-3T for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 09:43:01 +0200 Received: from localhost ([::1]:56486 helo=mjail0.freenet.de) by mjail0.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1SaizF-0003kc-11 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 09:43:01 +0200 Received: from [195.4.92.20] (port=57748 helo=10.mx.freenet.de) by mjail0.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1Saix2-0003IA-LO for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 09:40:44 +0200 Received: from blfd-4d08865e.pool.mediaways.net ([77.8.134.94]:3554 helo=[192.168.178.22]) by 10.mx.freenet.de with esmtpsa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (port 465) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1Saix2-0005xH-BR for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 09:40:44 +0200 Message-ID: <4FC9C37B.10501@freenet.de> Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2012 09:40:43 +0200 From: wolf_dl4yhf User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <8BE4322932454ABBAF36917E7F0B7293@uwePC> <02bb01cd3eb1$c4cb1730$1502a8c0@Clemens04> <1338444302.19906.YahooMailNeo@web171605.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <18D068A53AF74F56BF8AFDCCAB65CC62@AGB> <1338488029.92944.YahooMailNeo@web171606.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <97F0E98E40814C45B796CFAF1351D46C@AGB> <4FC7CDF7.1090909@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4FC7E2FC.3070002@psk31.plus.com> <3DD43F40887A4C08A4F53031CB126B04@AGB> <4FC7E880.8020604@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4FC7F143.7080106@psk31.plus.com> <9327865B4D2146DC9D9667D4740BAA56@AGB> <916F21C1B61C4940BDF1E88FBD13845C@Extensa> In-Reply-To: <916F21C1B61C4940BDF1E88FBD13845C@Extensa> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Peter, At the moment multiple running instances of SL don't "talk to each other" about the sample rate, even if they use the same audio device for input. In future versions, it will be possible to have the first instance running as 'master', providing a resampled(!) audio stream for all other instances. Those 'slave'-instances don't connect directly to the soundcard, but to the first running instance. I am not sure about how to connect the instances yet (via shared memory, or -even better- via TCP/IP so the slaves could run on physically different PCs if necessary). [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [195.4.92.96 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dl4yhf[at]freenet.de) -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 086f3faad0220c9ae57a7913e711a86d Subject: Re: LF: "SR cal" in spectrum lab question. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:424561088:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40864fc9c4606aee X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hello Peter, At the moment multiple running instances of SL don't "talk to each other" about the sample rate, even if they use the same audio device for input. In future versions, it will be possible to have the first instance running as 'master', providing a resampled(!) audio stream for all other instances. Those 'slave'-instances don't connect directly to the soundcard, but to the first running instance. I am not sure about how to connect the instances yet (via shared memory, or -even better- via TCP/IP so the slaves could run on physically different PCs if necessary). All the best, Wolf . Am 01.06.2012 20:50, schrieb PA1SDB, Peter: > Hello... > > I was wondering the following: > > I have here 4x Spectrum Lab task running at one PC to serve my SUB9KHz > grabber page at www.qsl.net/pa1sdb > I use that Sampling Rate detector in all 4 Spectrum Lab tasks. > Is that OK, or need I only one Sampling Rate detector that callibrates > the other 3 tasks to ? > (one master - 3 clients without that SR cal active) > > 73's Peter - PA1SDB > > > > >