Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dd01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 2561438000081; Sat, 26 May 2012 17:12:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SYOGL-0001Ov-Pn for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 26 May 2012 22:11:01 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SYOGL-0001Om-Ak for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 26 May 2012 22:11:01 +0100 Received: from cpsmtpb-ews08.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.39.13]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SYOGJ-0004Is-9I for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 26 May 2012 22:11:00 +0100 Received: from cpsps-ews20.kpnxchange.com ([10.94.84.186]) by cpsmtpb-ews08.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sat, 26 May 2012 23:10:58 +0200 Received: from CPSMTPM-CMT102.kpnxchange.com ([195.121.3.18]) by cpsps-ews20.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.17514); Sat, 26 May 2012 23:10:58 +0200 Received: from [192.168.2.13] ([62.131.23.134]) by CPSMTPM-CMT102.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.0.6002.18264); Sat, 26 May 2012 23:10:58 +0200 Message-ID: <4FC146E2.1040401@kpnmail.nl> Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 23:10:58 +0200 From: pa3abk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <495778BC-4950-48D3-B5E4-4DBCE69D729C@numeo.fr> <4FC00C2E.6070101@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4FC09285.2060102@kpnmail.nl> <4FC0EA66.8050207@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <4FC0EA66.8050207@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 May 2012 21:10:58.0219 (UTC) FILETIME=[0BBBC7B0:01CD3B84] X-RcptDomain: blacksheep.org X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On 26-5-2012 16:36, Stefan Schäfer wrote: Yes, the relais, this is what i am doing in all my HF PAs as well. I have a RX/TX relais that is bypassing the PA in RX mode. It is switched automatically, detecting a input signal on the right band (using a small band pass filter) and then switching to TX. It is fast enough so that a "dit" in CW at 120 BPM can still be detected. So, it is quasi full-BK mode. A delay time for releasing the relais can be adjusted by a pot. ==== TS440 has a build in relay for this purpose, the user has only to activate it. In those days it was designed to operate it with AMTOR so it's vy fast. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [213.75.39.13 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 TO_NO_BRKTS_PCNT To: misformatted + percentage X-Scan-Signature: 195b836cb7437e99aa05107459888659 Subject: Re: LF: 475 kHz exciter Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:455410976:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d408d4fc1473f5896 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : temperror On 26-5-2012 16:36, Stefan Schäfer wrote: Yes, the relais, this is what i am doing in all my HF PAs as well. I have a RX/TX relais that is bypassing the PA in RX mode. It is switched automatically, detecting a input signal on the right band (using a small band pass filter) and then switching to TX. It is fast enough so that a "dit" in CW at 120 BPM can still be detected. So, it is quasi full-BK mode. A delay time for releasing the relais can be adjusted by a pot. ==== TS440 has a build in relay for this purpose, the user has only to activate it. In those days it was designed to operate it with AMTOR so it's vy fast. Stefan Schäfer wrote: A mixer for receiving? How do you receive on MF? ==== TS440 considers 0,5-1,6MHz as broadcast. For this band an additional attenuator is inserted. If you by-pass it and having a nearby BCST stn all kind spurs will be generated. Think some ICOM sets have the same arrangement. I removed this attenuator but having a local AM station nearby it added more noise, so left the system in it's original state. Moving to the new QRG means that the TS440 will release the BCST attenuator, so the S-meter will move up. Stefan Schäfer wrote: The LPF in my PA actually is a BPF so i will have it in series to the RX. That will be a very good first preselector... ==== For 500 I use a small and simple bandpass filter which I "lurked" from PE1GRL, http://pe1grl.khds.nl/500kHz/rxtxbfsch.png In his turn he adapted it from yu1lm http://yu1lm.qrpradio.com/BP-LP%20filters%20for%20LF%20%20and%20500kHz.pdf This really cleans the signal from unwanted spur. View the local noise level is rather high here, there is no particular need for a very sensitive receiver. It's becoming worse every day anyway. For RX I use the TX antenna fully tuned. E-probe is also available but just 2m away from the 35m L-antenna. E-probe coupled strongly on the L-antenna. It is more acting as a buffer amplifier. Stefan Schäfer wrote: I still have no concept. Of course there are many but i have no decision so far. Yes, a simple DC receiver is my favourite as well. The IC-706 is an option but not quite /p (takes 1.5A in RX mode!). My K2 doesn't work there i am afraid. So i will need a converter. ==== The receiver here is just the TS440 direct. TX in split mode. PE1GRL used a modified 160m Softrock. Modification details on his website http://pe1grl.khds.nl/500kHz/500kHz.htm#_softrock Maybe SoftRock type is an option when /P. FYI PE1GRL mainly worked /P with a kite aerial. The moments he was QRV in WSPR he was vy strong in EU. Jan/pa3abk -- pa3abk<-> dordrecht jo21it