Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 22:58:51 +0200
From: Steinar Aanesland <saanes@broadpark.no>
In-reply-to: <003601cd39e7$3be9d060$1502a8c0@Clemens04>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Message-id: <4FBFF28B.9080903@broadpark.no>
MIME-version: 1.0
References:
 <CAHAQVWPELGnAZKqF3T7AaYo7pgd4GCTZO-L5iTCU3p3vYM+AEw@mail.gmail.com>
 <4FBE62F1.9020203@psk31.plus.com> <4FBE6D2A.6000907@usa.net>
 <006b01cd39e2$0b66efe0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
 <003601cd39e7$3be9d060$1502a8c0@Clemens04>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428
 Thunderbird/12.0.1
Subject: Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0  
x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60d94fbff2ed5a45
X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25
X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : temperror



hummm..an option to ban someone. I think I vote for yahoo too ;)

LA5VNA S


Den 24.05.2012 21:55, skrev Clemens Paul:
> >Do what you like but leave me OUT
> >G3KEV
>=20
> I vote for yahoo.)
>=20
> 73
> Clemens
> DL4RAJ
>=20
>=20
>=20
>
>     ----- Original Message -----
>     From: mal hamilton
>     To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
>     Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 9:17 PM
>     Subject: Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLE=
ASE
>     A moderator !!!!!!!!!!!!! or a censor !!!!!!!!!! and if you hav=
e
an opinion that differs from others you should be BANNED.
>     No discussion, no debate in other words a DICTORSHIP, hardly
democratic.
>     What next ???????????
>     I can manage without any of it and get on with amateur radio an=
d
experimentation. These past few days without the reflector has not
hindered my amateur radio activities and I do not need to be vetted b=
y
others !!
>     Do what you like but leave me OUT
>     G3KEV
>    =20
>
>         ----- Original Message -----
>         From: Alberto di Bene
>         To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
>         Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 5:17 PM
>         Subject: Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead ....=
.PLEASE
>         On 5/24/2012 6:33 PM, g3zjo wrote:
>>         Why not go for it and start it yourself.
>>         We know some will not move so it will be an additional
facility. Please make sure it is has no taboo, f
>>         frequencies, modes, opinions, or subjects rules, and no
childish sulking.
>         Another suggestion is to not make it an open group, meaning
that each request for membership should be
>         accompanied by a very short introductory message explaining
why that membership is requested.
>         Then the moderator(s) of the group will decide whether to
accept it or not.  I suppose the same is done
>         presently with the Majordomo mailer.
>
>         And, if that introductory message is convincing, but up to =
a
point... then the moderator can accept the individual,
>         but putting him in moderation status, meaning that every
message from him must be examined by the moderator(s)
>         before being published.  The moderation status can be remov=
ed
after a couple of legitimate messages from the guy,
>         showing that he is not a troll or spammer.
>
>         I use this method on my soft_radio  Yahoo group=20
>         http://groups.yahoo.com/group/soft_radio/
>         with more than 2300 subscribers, and, if memory serves, I h=
ad
just a couple of cases where a spam message
>         got through in more than 8 years of the existence of that g=
roup.
>
>         73  Alberto  I2PHD
>
>     E-Mail ist virenfrei.
>     Von AVG =FCberpr=FCft - www.avg.de
>     Version: 2012.0.2176 / Virendatenbank: 2425/5019 - Ausgabedatum=
:
24.05.2012
>