Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-me04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 12C4138000086; Thu, 24 May 2012 12:35:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SXaz8-0006I1-3n for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 24 May 2012 17:33:58 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SXaz7-0006Hs-JQ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 24 May 2012 17:33:57 +0100 Received: from out1.ip03ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.239]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SXaz5-0001VF-In for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 24 May 2012 17:33:56 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMBAORhvk9Oln8n/2dsb2JhbAANNrgAAQEBAQNJQAsJCwQJFg8JAwIBAgFFEwgBARaHfrtVin+FIAOVGIEPkUw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,652,1330905600"; d="scan'208,217";a="387057422" Received: from host-78-150-127-39.as13285.net (HELO [192.168.2.7]) ([78.150.127.39]) by out1.ip03ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 24 May 2012 17:33:53 +0100 Message-ID: <4FBE62F1.9020203@psk31.plus.com> Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 17:33:53 +0100 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Roger Why not go for it and start it yourself. We know some will not move so it will be an additional facility. Please make sure it is has no taboo, frequencies, modes, opinions, or subjects rules, and no childish sulking. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [62.24.128.239 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: d5ac66e7920295f519efeb68ecc59e6f Subject: Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060206090204040004060205" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:479692064:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d608c4fbe63360cd1 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------060206090204040004060205 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Roger Why not go for it and start it yourself. We know some will not move so it will be an additional facility. Please make sure it is has no taboo, frequencies, modes, opinions, or subjects rules, and no childish sulking. Eddie On 23/05/2012 22:51, Roger Lapthorn wrote: > With the latest outage (5 days already) may I again suggest that the > LF-reflector migrates to a Yahoo group? > > In over 10 years I have rarely had delays in messages, outages, or > problems with any group to which I belong or moderate. > > Instead they have had these advantages: > > 1. Messages can be read on the web if preferred (saves cluttered > in-boxes) > 2. There is rarely a delay of more than a few minutes before messages > are received. > 3. All messages are archived and searchable. > 4. Large files can be stored. > 5. Photos can be stored - 100Gigs worth. > 6. Links can be stored/shared > 7. Videos can be stored. > 8. Polls can be run. > 9. Messages can be vetted if preferred (by a number of moderators to > speed up the process) > 10. Difficult members can be banned in exceptional circumstances. > 11. Spam messages can be filtered > 12. Calendars can be set up (for sked times, news of tests etc) > > The advantages go ON and ON and, frankly, I simply cannot understand > why the change hasn't made years ago. With the problems this week it > is surely time. > > To set up a new Yahoo group called "LF-reflector" (or whatever) would > take about 30 seconds and migration to it by all interested members > here would take about a day at most. All you need is to agree a group > name, who owns it, who can moderate posts and some basic group ground > rules/FAQs. > > Please, think about it again. > > 73s > Roger G3XBM > > -- > http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ > http://www.g3xbm.co.uk > https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/ > http://qss2.blogspot.com/ > > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 2012.0.2176 / Virus Database: 2425/5019 - Release Date: 05/24/12 > --------------060206090204040004060205 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Roger

Why not go for it and start it yourself.
We know some will not move so it will be an additional facility. Please make sure it is has no taboo, frequencies, modes, opinions, or subjects rules, and no childish sulking.

Eddie

On 23/05/2012 22:51, Roger Lapthorn wrote:
With the latest outage (5 days already) may I again suggest that the LF-reflector migrates to a Yahoo group?

In over 10 years I have rarely had delays in messages, outages, or problems with any group to which I belong or moderate.

Instead they have had these advantages:
  1. Messages can be read on the web if preferred (saves cluttered in-boxes)
  2. There is rarely a delay of more than a few minutes before messages are received.
  3. All messages are archived and searchable.
  4. Large files can be stored.
  5. Photos can be stored - 100Gigs worth.
  6. Links can be stored/shared
  7. Videos can be stored.
  8. Polls can be run.
  9. Messages can be vetted if preferred (by a number of moderators to speed up the process)
  10. Difficult members can be banned in exceptional circumstances.
  11. Spam messages can be filtered
  12. Calendars can be set up (for sked times, news of tests etc)
The advantages go ON and ON and, frankly, I simply cannot understand why the change hasn't made years ago. With the problems this week it is surely time.

To set up a new Yahoo group called "LF-reflector" (or whatever) would take about 30 seconds and migration to it by all interested members here would take about a day at most. All you need is to agree a group name, who owns it, who can moderate posts and some basic group ground rules/FAQs.

Please, think about it again.

73s
Roger G3XBM

--
http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/
http://qss2.blogspot.com/

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2176 / Virus Database: 2425/5019 - Release Date: 05/24/12


--------------060206090204040004060205--