Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mb04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 6BA1838000085; Wed, 9 May 2012 10:27:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SS7qs-0006LA-Qx for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 09 May 2012 15:26:50 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SS7qs-0006L1-El for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 09 May 2012 15:26:50 +0100 Received: from mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.49]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SS7qq-0006Q3-Lc for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 09 May 2012 15:26:49 +0100 Received: from aamtaout04-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vM.7.08.04.00 201-2186-134-20080326) with ESMTP id <20120509142646.YGGB10053.mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamtaout04-winn.ispmail.ntl.com> for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 15:26:46 +0100 Received: from [192.168.2.2] (really [82.5.252.56]) by aamtaout04-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vG.3.00.04.00 201-2196-133-20080908) with ESMTP id <20120509142646.QLOL23925.aamtaout04-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@[192.168.2.2]> for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 15:26:46 +0100 From: "Mike Dennison" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 15:26:43 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <4FAA8CB3.30691.4E0B436@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.41) Content-description: Mail message body X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=JvdXmxIgLJv2/GthKqHpGJEEHukvLcvELVXUanXFreg= c=1 sm=0 a=uObrxnre4hsA:10 a=9YlaCzn6_68A:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=IfzaU1PpfVvXxi09yyIA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Further to my recent plea for help, I have tested the USB sound card on a newer laptop and it works OK. The older computer uses USB 1, whereas the newer one uses USB 2. Is this an issue? Both run on WinXP (newer one is XP Pro). [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [81.103.221.49 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Scan-Signature: cc2e5baae40f8f7a09b47e6877ef0bfb Subject: LF: Sound card help - more Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:298062112:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60184faa7ee13bc6 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Further to my recent plea for help, I have tested the USB sound card on a newer laptop and it works OK. The older computer uses USB 1, whereas the newer one uses USB 2. Is this an issue? Both run on WinXP (newer one is XP Pro). I would prefer to use the older laptop (as it is spare) so I am still looking for ideas. The original sound card worked well before it went faulty. Mike, G3XDV ==========