Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dk05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 6AA43380000BD; Sat, 5 May 2012 13:21:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SQiel-0005v0-Rq for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 05 May 2012 18:20:31 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SQiel-0005ur-G2 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 05 May 2012 18:20:31 +0100 Received: from out1.ip06ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.242]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SQiej-0006D9-93 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 05 May 2012 18:20:30 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMBAKhgpU9OlmIS/2dsb2JhbAANOK9DhkQBAQEBAzhRCwkPCRYPCQMCAQIBRRMIAQHCAYp/gnqDJgSVfpMs X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,536,1330905600"; d="scan'208";a="537146012" Received: from host-78-150-98-18.as13285.net (HELO [192.168.2.6]) ([78.150.98.18]) by out1.ip06ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 05 May 2012 18:20:28 +0100 Message-ID: <4FA56157.6070803@psk31.plus.com> Date: Sat, 05 May 2012 18:20:23 +0100 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4F99A446.4080400@o2.co.uk> <1335704544.3002.5.camel@g4gvw-high-grade> <005501cd2919$aeeb9b90$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <1336230768.3737.10.camel@g4gvw-high-grade> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On 05/05/2012 17:34, Andy Talbot wrote: > Can you resend the attachment in a format we can actually read. > We ? that was a lovely document:-) Eddie [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [62.24.128.242 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Scan-Signature: 73624bb08a20c2e0895fd0d9fb8136a4 Subject: Re: LF: UK Ae mast planning info Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:457533440:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1db4094fa5618d7e79 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none On 05/05/2012 17:34, Andy Talbot wrote: > Can you resend the attachment in a format we can actually read. > We ? that was a lovely document:-) Eddie