Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-da04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 11C9E38000244; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 07:04:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1S88SW-0000QT-Ke for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:03:04 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1S88SV-0000QK-Oc for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:03:03 +0000 Received: from cmsout01.mbox.net ([165.212.64.31]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1S88ST-0005hR-Mu for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:03:03 +0000 Received: from cmsout01.mbox.net (cmsout01-lo [127.0.0.1]) by cmsout01.mbox.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A600A2AD4DD for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:02:54 +0000 (GMT) X-USANET-Received: from cmsout01.mbox.net [127.0.0.1] by cmsout01.mbox.net via mtad (C8.MAIN.3.72B) with ESMTP id 732qcoLcY7520M01; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:02:50 -0000 X-USANET-Routed: 3 gwsout-vs Q:bmvirus Received: from cmsapps02.cms.usa.net [165.212.11.138] by cmsout01.mbox.net via smtad (C8.MAIN.3.72B) with ESMTP id XID940qcoLcY6442X01; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:02:50 -0000 X-USANET-Source: 165.212.11.138 IN dibene@usa.net cmsapps02.cms.usa.net X-USANET-MsgId: XID940qcoLcY6442X01 Received: from [127.0.0.1] [151.55.2.86] by cmsapps02.cms.usa.net (ESMTPSA/dibene@usa.net) via mtad (C8.MAIN.3.72B) with ESMTPSA id 007qcoLcY7568M38; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:02:50 -0000 X-USANET-Auth: 151.55.2.86 AUTH dibene@usa.net [127.0.0.1] Message-ID: <4F61CC58.9070900@usa.net> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:02:48 +0100 From: Alberto di Bene User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <3B33CADA53AE4E19869519EA6A9ECB7B@IBM7FFA209F07C> In-Reply-To: <3B33CADA53AE4E19869519EA6A9ECB7B@IBM7FFA209F07C> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 120315-0, 03/15/2012), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Z-USANET-MsgId: XID007qcoLcY7568X38 X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: New Argo Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090300020604070005000902" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:511230080:93952408 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d404c4f61cca51966 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------090300020604070005000902 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 3/15/2012 8:42 AM, Chris wrote: > Having thought all was well I find it is not. When running in NDB mode I find it wont allow any changes e.g. > sensitivity, and wont even let me shut it down. > The cursor refuses to change. It is OK at slower modes, QRSS3 etc., providing I start it running in that mode. > I checked the processor use and it says 100%. I am beginning to think the new version uses a lot more processing than > my old computer can manage. > No problem with the old version. > Guess the only solution to this one is a new computer! > Thanks for the zip file, much easier to deal with from my point of view. Hi Gary, yes, the CPU "eaten" by this version of Argo is greater than the old version, as the waterfall computations must be done on a much greater number of pixels. And in NDB mode the whole process must be repeated many times per second... Have you tried to set the speed to "Slow", when in NDB mode, this before pressing the Start button ? I tested it also on an Atom mainboard, with Win 7 64 bits, not a particularly fast computer, on the contrary... but it runs without problems even there. 73 Alberto I2PHD --------------090300020604070005000902 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 3/15/2012 8:42 AM, Chris wrote:
Having thought all was well = I find it is not.=A0When running in NDB mode I find it wont allow any changes e.g. sensitivity, and wont even let me shut it down.
The cursor refuses to change. It is OK at slower modes, QRSS3 etc., providing I start it running in that mode.
=
I checked the processor use = and it says 100%. I am beginning to think the new version uses a lot more processing than my old computer can manage.
No problem with the old version.
Guess the only solution to t= his one is a new computer!
Thanks for the zip file, much easier to deal with from my point of view.
Hi Gary,

=A0 yes, the CPU "eaten" by this version of Argo is greater than the old version, as the waterfall computations must be done on
a much greater number of pixels.=A0 And in NDB mode the whole process must be repeated many times per second...

Have you tried to set the speed to "Slow", when in NDB mode, this before pressing the Start button ?
I tested it also on an Atom mainboard, with Win 7 64 bits, not a particularly fast computer, on the contrary...
but it runs without problems even there.

73=A0 Alberto=A0 I2PHD

--------------090300020604070005000902--