Message-ID: <4F496A64.6000109@freenet.de>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 00:10:28 +0100
From: wolf_dl4yhf <dl4yhf@freenet.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <4F496492.8040602@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
In-Reply-To: <4F496492.8040602@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
Subject: Re: LF: CW beacon on 136.8 kHz
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0  
x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40594f496b425d00
X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25
X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none


Q5 here, using a TS850 and a non-resonant piece of wire (10 meter long 
dipole in the attic)...

Am 25.02.2012 23:45, schrieb Stefan Schäfer:
> LF,
>
> Since about 14 UTC i'm running a CW beacon on 136.8 kHz. There have 
> been several spots in the dx cluster and i got many mails from OMs who 
> heared a CW signal on LF for the first time. Some stated they become 
> intersted to "try some tests" on LF. Maybe a CW beacon is a good 
> alternative to wake some interest in that band for newcomers, at least 
> in a radius of 2000 km, with some luck. :-)
>
> I think i will run the beacon over night and tomorrow. Level is at -4 
> dB f.s.
>
> 73, Stefan/DK7FC
>
>
>
>
>