Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-ma02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 946E738000094 for ; Thu, 9 Feb 2012 17:01:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Rvbm2-0002Gt-VI for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:43:26 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Rvbm2-0002Gk-Jj for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:43:26 +0000 Received: from out1.ip03ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.239]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Rvbm0-0003JS-9F for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:43:26 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMBAMU9NE9OlmPh/2dsb2JhbAAMN60khTEBAQEBAzhAEQsJDwkWDwkDAgECAUUTCAEBwS2LZw8TBAUFBQcBBQQDBAQHDgYBAwgBBB8DAYNje4MdBI1kmi4 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,392,1325462400"; d="scan'208";a="374960947" Received: from host-78-150-99-225.as13285.net (HELO [192.168.2.5]) ([78.150.99.225]) by out1.ip03ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 09 Feb 2012 21:43:12 +0000 Message-ID: <4F343DF0.8070309@talktalk.net> Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:43:12 +0000 From: qrss User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120129 Thunderbird/10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4F341AE5.1050704@talktalk.net> <4F342525.1050200@talktalk.net> <4F34313C.1080005@talktalk.net> <1659D80990BC4B5482FF78B6249AACAF@JimPC> In-Reply-To: <1659D80990BC4B5482FF78B6249AACAF@JimPC> X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: Cats among pigeons Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:512531040:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d600a4f3442444511 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi James Yes that is what I consider I have been observing and with the help of Trevor and Cor testing to the best of our ability with a 3dB TX power step from decode to no decode, during steady signal conditions this afternoon and visible QSB this evening. E On 09/02/2012 21:11, James Moritz wrote: > Dear Eddie, LF Group, > > So what you are saying is that the actual SNR at the decode/no decode > threshold is the same for Op8 and Op4, but that the SNR indicated by > Op8 at this level is 3dB lower than that indicated by Op4? > > Cheers, Jim Moritz > 73 de M0BMU > >