Message-ID: <4F2BAF6F.2070304@talktalk.net>
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 09:57:03 +0000
From: qrss <qrss@talktalk.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <4F2AF276.7010409@talktalk.net> <95C27D36A5E94FBC9B4C08EFE23DA0C0@AGB> <4F2AF91B.8010709@talktalk.net> <4F2B05E2.5000702@talktalk.net> <5E2F40141AB04AD694830C7053616E9B@JimPC>
In-Reply-To: <5E2F40141AB04AD694830C7053616E9B@JimPC>
Subject: Re: LF: WSPR V OPERA
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0  
x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60ce4f2bafb26e7a
X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25
X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none


Thanks Jim

I saw you decoded so I left it on for you to get a few transmissions.

Most interesting result, In line with the expected theoretical 
difference too, I think G0KTN and myself will be looking at it today.

I think the FANT0M has done his job and will be exterminated.

73 Eddie

On 03/02/2012 01:15, James Moritz wrote:
> Dear Eddie, LF Group,
>
> I monitored your WSPR transmission for a few hours here, which 
> reported SNR levels between -22 and -20dB. This compares to your Op4 
> beacon at -23 to -26dB reported SNR. So a difference in SNR reports of 
> about 4dB, in line with Rik's tests - much smaller than observed by 
> G0KTN for some reason.
>
> Cheers, Jim Moritz
> 73 de M0BMU
>
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2112/4782 - Release Date: 02/02/12
>
>