Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mg06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 1434C380000D7; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:03:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1RnaS3-00024h-Id for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 18:41:39 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1RnaS3-00024Y-1b for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 18:41:39 +0000 Received: from mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.48]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1RnaS2-0007Eg-4B for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 18:41:39 +0000 Received: from aamtaout04-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vM.7.08.04.00 201-2186-134-20080326) with ESMTP id <20120118184131.OQLC27245.mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamtaout04-winn.ispmail.ntl.com> for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 18:41:31 +0000 Received: from [192.168.2.2] (really [82.5.252.56]) by aamtaout04-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vG.3.00.04.00 201-2196-133-20080908) with ESMTP id <20120118184131.YRMN23925.aamtaout04-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@[192.168.2.2]> for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 18:41:31 +0000 From: "Mike Dennison" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 18:41:27 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <4F171257.10322.BA1218@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com> In-reply-to: <002b01ccd608$af2ebce0$8cd9160a@EFREMOV> References: , <002b01ccd608$af2ebce0$8cd9160a@EFREMOV> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.41) Content-description: Mail message body X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=R50lirqlHffDPPkwUlkuVa99MrvKdVWo//yz83qex8g= c=1 sm=0 a=GZzJwXCciNIA:10 a=uObrxnre4hsA:10 a=9YlaCzn6_68A:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=F3M5lZpKAAAA:8 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=qV0mfD4mAAAA:8 a=wV9FcBFsAAAA:8 a=8di75dDnlWdIe0-Wf2QA:9 a=rN1dwtgrv8AucDIN6R0A:7 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=wk6s2zzMB60A:10 a=MSl-tDqOz04A:10 a=ao4RW71Vw8YA:10 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: Opera continuous changes Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:476572896:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60ce4f1717660f3c X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none I think what Andrey is saying is is it possible to turn down / off the 'sidetone' when transmitting. It is useful to have the audio turned up when receiving but the transmit sidetone can be loud. Mike, G3XDV ========== On 18 Jan 2012 at 21:42, rn3agc wrote: > Thanks, Gary, > > But I meant not it. I also work with the help "CW Keyer". > In this case the sound card for TX isn't necessary. > Instead of listening to music (for example), it is necessary > to listen to tones OPERA. > Here that I meant. > > 73 > Andrey > > > > Hi Andrey, > > > > You can Tx without a soundcard by setting a COM port to "CW Keyer" > > in the "Rig" set up within Opera "Configure" & key the transmitter > > that way. > > > > I Tx with my Class D transmitter that way & is OK. > > Soundcard will be required for receive. > > > > 73, Gary - G4WGT. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "rn3agc" > > To: > > Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 9:43 PM > > Subject: Re: LF: Opera continuous changes > > > > > >> Hi Graham, > >> > >> I will express a little not on a theme... > >> It would be desirable, that there was a choice: > >> to use a sound card for TX or not. > >> Thanks. > >> > >> 73 > >> Andrey > >> > >> > >> > >>> All seismic activity has aftershocks .. > >>> > >>> It was felt the Op50 /64 was perhaps too long a capture > >>> period for 136Khz with max 33% data loss this was still > >>> 40mins , which , was possibly a little too long. > >>> > >>> OP32 , will reduce to 20 mins capture window and is perhaps > >>> more realistic? > >>> > >>> Any views on this would be appreciated > >>> > >>> Tnx G.. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -------------------------------------------------- > >>> From: "Andy Talbot" > >>> Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 9:12 AM > >>> To: "o_p_e_r_a_" ; > >>> > >>> Subject: LF: Opera continuous changes > >>> > >>>> Just after I'd spent yesterday morning reprogramming the PIC > >>>> code, re-writing the documentation and uploading to website for > >>>> general access, the coding has been changed again. > >>>> > >>>> That's it. I'm not changing again until something has stabilised. > >>>> The version posted only yesterday will now be removed, and not > >>>> replaced for the time being. If you want an independent PIC based > >>>> source, you're on your own > >>>> > >>>> If fundamental changes are going to me made like this, please at > >>>> least warn us in advance. > >>>> > >>>> Andy > >>>> www.g4jnt.com > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > > >