Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25])
	by mtain-de05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id C930738000150;
	Sun, 21 Aug 2011 14:28:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
	id 1QvCkT-0003ms-Da
	for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2011 19:27:53 +0100
Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
	by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
	id 1QvCkS-0003mj-Sp
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2011 19:27:52 +0100
Received: from mout4.freenet.de ([195.4.92.94])
	by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <dl4yhf@freenet.de>)
	id 1QvCkR-0007C6-GK
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2011 19:27:52 +0100
Received: from [195.4.92.26] (helo=16.mx.freenet.de)
	by mout4.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.76 #5)
	id 1QvCkQ-0000pM-O3
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2011 20:27:50 +0200
Received: from blfd-4db1a764.pool.mediaways.net ([77.177.167.100]:1230 helo=[192.168.0.101])
	by 16.mx.freenet.de with esmtpsa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (port 465) (Exim 4.76 #5)
	id 1QvCkQ-00079o-FZ
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2011 20:27:50 +0200
Message-ID: <4E514E24.7030205@freenet.de>
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2011 20:27:48 +0200
From: wolf_dl4yhf <dl4yhf@freenet.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <16BC8B3CA8672445BC2A29B4C14A26D4379ED2AAB4@exlnmb01.eur.nsroot.net> <4DF9EFD1.5010208@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <1313780109.51443.YahooMailNeo@web111907.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <9CD1E11E8BC9402CB4AECECAC4088443@JimPC> <00f801cc6004$c2282bd0$1502a8c0@Clemens04> <CAJqZy6yoySSmxUwW9nS6u6b7p9PK6nm4XQbFbKpKydjB70-1vw@mail.gmail.com> <4E513642.9060403@freenet.de> <006601cc6024$05c22340$66a5fe04@ctrask> <001b01cc602c$88403ac0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
In-Reply-To: <001b01cc602c$88403ac0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+)
X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: Ferrite wideband antennas?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
x-aol-global-disposition: G
X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:407441408:93952408  
X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0  
x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40cd4e514e696ebb
X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25
X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none


Hi Mal,

Am 21.08.2011 20:02, schrieb mal hamilton:
> Look at it this way. An air wound coil by itself will induce a voltage into
> a radio receiver whereas a ferrite rod by itself will NOT, so the ferrite
> rod enhances the air wound coil. Is it a question of defination
> I am just trying to look at it logically, and in simplistic terms
> g3kev
yes, but in simplistic terms nothing stops the ferrite rod to 
"concentrate" the magnetic field lines (from the surrounding air) inside 
the ferrite material, caused by the mu_r being much larger than the 
surrounding air. Regardless of the presence of the coil. Oh well if 
there's no coil there won't be a voltage being induced in the coil, it 
that's what the author wanted to say ?!

Cheers,
    Wolf .