Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25])
	by mtain-md04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 244AA380000BC;
	Fri, 19 Aug 2011 16:09:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
	id 1QuVM4-0002c2-EZ
	for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 21:07:48 +0100
Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
	by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
	id 1QuVLz-0002bt-VB
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 21:07:43 +0100
Received: from mailt.toya.net.pl ([217.113.224.9] ident=postfix)
	by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <sq7mpj@toya.net.pl>)
	id 1QuVLx-0001UT-Cp
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 21:07:43 +0100
Received: from mail.toya.net.pl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.toya.net.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B2F6200006A6
	for <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 22:07:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail.toya.net.pl (Postfix, from userid 5001)
	id 715F5200006BF; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 22:07:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.1.101] (unknown [10.3.153.39])
	(Authenticated sender: unimlyn@toya.net.pl)
	by mail.toya.net.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DC2CC200006A6
	for <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 22:07:38 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4E4EC28A.80708@toya.net.pl>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 22:07:38 +0200
From: Piotr Mlynarski <sq7mpj@toya.net.pl>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <D5C5F0AD-926E-46DF-83D5-AB5CAE68D897@hurontel.on.ca> <7.0.1.0.1.20110819095835.01ba53e8@xtra.co.nz> <4E4D96F0.6050409@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <1313740427.69106.YahooMailNeo@web111905.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <1313740947.33597.YahooMailNeo@web111915.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <4E4E220A.7070706@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
In-Reply-To: <4E4E220A.7070706@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none
Subject: Re: LF: Ferrite Receive Antennas
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
x-aol-global-disposition: G
X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:375803456:93952408  
X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0  
x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60584e4ec2e7530a
X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25
X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none


Stefan Sch=E4fer pisze:
>
> DCF39 is about 500 km distant to you. You should receive it some 10 dB=20
> better as you did. This is probably caused by local QRM.
> What is the gain of your amp stage?
> And what is the Q of the antenna's LC circuit?
> BTW this small antenna is good to find a quiet place in the local=20
> region and help to find the location of local QRM sources. So once one=20
> has found the quietest place in the garden, a bigger loop may be=20
> instelled there...
> I have some problems with the dynamic range of my soundcard which is=20
> 120 dB in 1 Hz. Not bad but DCF39 comes in at up to 97 dB and if i=20
> want to stay 15 dB above the soundcards noise (in the passband) it=20
> becomes critical.
>
> I saw that there are big differences between different capacitor=20
> types. Replacing a standard foil cap by a styroflex cap increased the=20
> Q from 130 to 480! I took a cheap variable cap (100 pF) with a foil=20
> dielectricum to resonate the antenna and saw that Q decreases with=20
> increasing C of this small cap. The styroflex type is 2.2 nF. Then i=20
> found a 47 pF silver plated varable cap with air dielectricum which=20
> even has a 6mm axis. Now i think about using this cap and some=20
> switches and fixed caps (47 pF, 100 pF, 220 pF) for resonating...
>
> About the winding on my antenna: I stopped optimising after getting=20
> that Q of 486 at 55 turns but actually it could be useful to further=20
> increase the number of turns as long as the Q doesn't decrease to=20
> much. Have to do some tests with various C values and see how the Q=20
> changes as a function of frequency. More turns would result in a=20
> higher output voltage. Furthermore i would get a wider range of=20
> frequency variation by that small 47 pF varicap. The current Z of my=20
> LC circuit is just about 500 Ohm...
>
> Will you further optimise your system and try to receive some DX=20
> signals with it or was it just a test? :-)
>
> 73, Stefan/DK7FC
>
Hi Stefan, LF
the rx setup  mentioned in my previous mail  has been built   yesterday=20
afternoon/evening  so it definitely needs improvements/rearrangements etc=
..
first of all i must raise the  ferrite from the floor , find more=20
suitable place an so on.. the voltage gain of the buffer/amplifier stage=20
is abt 27 dB
the cap in LC consists of three parallel mica capacitors of nominaly 560=20
pf  each + 500 pf  air variable
i do not have a VNA at hand so in fact no serious measurements have been=20
made. Of course, i will make further  experiments
and if i catch any distant signal, sure, will announce here.. :)

                                           73, Piotr, sq7mpj

qth:  Lodz/jo91rs/